• MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    “You know what would be a cool Easter egg for the fans? The new Death Star that’s 100 times as large…? We’ll call it Starkiller base. Cause you know Skywalker’s original name was Starkiller.”

    Hurr-durr-durrr.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          take any studio, have them pump out a few dozen films.

          there’s gonna be diamonds and there’s gonna be stinkers. period. no one bats a thousand.

          marvel, disney, lucasfilm, DEE FUCKING CEE lol, but any studio / franchise - anywhere - there’s gonna be good and bad.

          I cannot fathom why fanboys can’t grasp this.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Maybe… but Skywalker was definitely originally called Starkiller back in the 70s before Lucas changed it to a more positive sounding name. It was in one of the original scripts.

        EDIT, from Wiki:

        George Lucas considered various characterizations for the protagonist of the original Star Wars film.[s] The possibilities included a 60-year-old grizzled war hero, a Jedi Master, a dwarf, and a woman.[5][6] Luke’s original surname was “Starkiller”, and it remained in the script until a few months into filming. It was dropped due to what Lucas called “unpleasant connotations” with Charles Manson, who became a “star killer” in 1969 when he murdered the well-known actress Sharon Tate.[7][8] Lucas replaced the problematic name “Starkiller” with “Skywalker”.[9]