• Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      And how does that change the fact that the post says there aren’t any? Last time I checked 1 is more than 0.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

        Unless you have weird double standards and only apply them when it’s convenient.

        • Cleggory@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

          It’s called mental gymnastics to think “two wrongs make a right.”

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

            • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              an argument that was never made

              It says 0 scandals right there in the post

              Just because the other guy also has scandals doesn’t mean she has 0

            • Cleggory@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              You didn’t make this absurd claim?:

              If something affects both sides it’s effectively “a wash” and cancel each other out.

              If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize “to cancel it out”?

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                Context is important, that’s how we continue the conversation.

                If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It’s effectively a wash and pointless to say “well Candidate A supports genocide!”

                Hope this clarified my meaning.

                • Cleggory@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

                  Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

                  • nomous@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own *farts so go off.

                    Whatever helps you sleep at night

        • Womdat10@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          That doesn’t work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)