• _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    what is the point of the distinction even? ‘that is’ make sense to introduce an example and vice versa

    • IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      To add to the explanations, here are some examples that might help:
      There are various transportation methods, e.g. cars

      There are various transportation methods, i.e. ways for a person to move from one location to another

    • Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess another way to put it is that “i.e.” is more specific while “e.g.” is more general. So “i.e.” carries an energy of “I am referring very specifically to the following” while “e.g.” means “there are other things that I’m not mentioning”. So the use of “i.e.” in the Tumblr post would imply that “tattoo”, “sushi”, and “guillotine” are the only loanwords in the English language.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      One gives a definition or clarification and the other is a set of examples. If you do that with a word that your listener has never seen or heard before, you will miscommunicate.

      Here watch when I use made up words:

      I enjoy multifacetous martialific numbrate (i.e., chess).

      If I selected carelessly, does this mean I like games or that I specifically like chess? Maybe here it doesn’t matter, but what if I’m describing a category of things I’m allergic to vs a specific example? It’s worth being able to articulate either case distinctly no?

      • stevehobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not just specific example. i.e. when used in contract law is a limited list of things covered.

        Acts of god (i.e. fire or flood) would not include hail or rain or lightning or….

        Acts of god (e.g. fire or flood) would include anything you could argue to a judge is an act of god.

        If they use ie in a contract, you would first have to argue they didn’t mean to use ie and both parties believes them not to be a complete list, and were supposed to be examples of.