No, she (Cannon) literally mentioned she was waiting for a decision on this case as well since some of the evidence showed he had people stealing documents BEFORE he left office.
The DC judge (Chutkan) related to this won’t fuck around due to this ruling, and is even somewhat empowered by it since it puts more power in her hands. I don’t think they can fast track it though, so that sucks.
Really doesn’t change that you were going on about this case (overturning election case) being maga all the way down, while Cannon is on a different case (documents case).
So how is this case (overturning the election) maga all the way down? I’ve not read up on it and if you can fill us in that’d be great.
If you come in with grand claims about this case (overturning election case), then you better be prepared to back that up for this case (overturning election case).
Christ. Being Pedantic on the Internet is a privilege, not a right, buddy. I clarified it. Move on with your day, and I hope you have better things to do. 🙄
First thing that came up, but pretty accurate: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/06/29/opinion/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-documents-case/
I didn’t even have to open that to see that’s the documents case. This post was about immunity for trying to overturn the election. Different cases.
No, she (Cannon) literally mentioned she was waiting for a decision on this case as well since some of the evidence showed he had people stealing documents BEFORE he left office.
The DC judge (Chutkan) related to this won’t fuck around due to this ruling, and is even somewhat empowered by it since it puts more power in her hands. I don’t think they can fast track it though, so that sucks.
Really doesn’t change that you were going on about this case (overturning election case) being maga all the way down, while Cannon is on a different case (documents case).
So how is this case (overturning the election) maga all the way down? I’ve not read up on it and if you can fill us in that’d be great.
There are multiple judges in multiple cases waiting for this decision. I’m not getting your point.
If you come in with grand claims about this case (overturning election case), then you better be prepared to back that up for this case (overturning election case).
Just did. Not understanding your point still.
You really didn’t, you went to other cases. And not just the supreme Court bit, all the way down on this case (overturning election case).
But I see you’re not going to admit it.
Christ. Being Pedantic on the Internet is a privilege, not a right, buddy. I clarified it. Move on with your day, and I hope you have better things to do. 🙄