Wikipedia’s editors voted to declare the Anti-Defamation League “generally unreliable” on Israel and Palestine as well as the issue of antisemitism, adding the organisation to a list of banned sources, according to a report by the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA).

The report said that an “overwhelming majority” of Wikipedia editors voted to deem the organisation unreliable.

The decision puts the pro-Israel organisation, which has a long history of demonising Palestine activism, in a group alongside the National Inquirer, Newsmax, TMZ, and the conspiracist website Infowars.

Many editors at the online encyclopedia said that the ADL undermined its credibility as a reliable source of information by altering how it categorises antisemitic incidents, which include pro-Palestine protests.

The editors also cited controversial statements by ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, who has claimed student protests were proxies of Iran and compared the Palestinian keffiyeh head scarf to the swastika.

The ADL also has a long history of attacking Palestinian rights movements with labels of antisemitism, and has previously worked with US law enforcement to spy on Arab-American groups. It has also facilitated and funded US police training trips to Israel.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Goes to show how low the bar is that the ADL failed to meet.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Thier actual news reporting is basically fine. It’s the other 90% of their content that’s all talking heads that blatantly lies about everything where the problems come in.

      I have a relative that only watched the channel. When the actual news segments come it’s like a wave of fresh air. But then it very quickly changes to the talking heads bullshit.

      I’d never willingly watch any of it though.

    • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      From Wikipedia

      Fox News[r] (news excluding politics and science)

      Historically, there has been consensus that Fox News is generally reliable for news coverage on topics other than politics and science. However, many editors expressed concerns about the reliability of Fox News for any topic in a 2023 RFC. No formal consensus was reached on the matter, though. See also: Fox News (politics and science)Fox News (talk shows).