• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Memes are the political cartoons of the 2000s. Hopefully a bit funny, but more about the message.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sounds like a dumbass problem to me. Kid has some funny lines.

          More importantly though, the space exists for both, apolitical memes and political alike. My point with the previous comment is that these kinds of small, digestible, somewhat funny but really more poignant pieces have been around since politics have. Once again, they’re called political cartoons. They’ve been co-opted into practically every form of comedy throughout history. This is nothing new to memes.

        • Snapz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          You got an ouchie on your feefees, bud?

          The child presents as “gee whiz, aww shucks mister” and then his words are increasingly harsh and abrupt (coincidentally, they are also true). The juxtaposition in the child’s presentation is objectively funny.

          If the precocious little guy was here right now, he’d probably be eating a giant novelty lollipop and asking you if you brush your teeth every time you get done licking those boots.

    • Crampon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      People who make politics their identity ain’t funny. None of them are. No exceptions.

      They are bitter people living in rage. Doesn’t matter what faction.

      Oh how many comments I have seen on Lemmy from lefties suggesting death or violence upon right wing people. Horse shoe theory is not a theory. Tjeu should just get together and fuck or something.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh how many comments I have seen on Lemmy from lefties suggesting death or violence upon right wing people. Horse shoe theory is not a theory. Tjeu should just get together and fuck or something.

            Sniff your own farts harder.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Everything I don’t like or understand is lefties!!! Objective, verifiable reality is lefties!!! The consequences of my own actions are lefties”

        • Censored@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just yesterday I had a conversation here with a self-described communist who thought the entire American middle class should be murdered by a mob for being part of a capitalist society that exploits poorer nations.

          So I would categorize that as a leftist on Lemmy suggesting death or violence on people. Not only right wing, either.

          • Snapz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m going to guess, reading between the lines here… “Just yesterday I had a conversation (that I didn’t have) with a real person (who doesn’t exist)”

            • Censored@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              If only that were true. But sadly, no. Here’s a link, I think: https://lemmy.world/comment/10693493

              I’ll direct you to the key paragraph:

              Yes [the Kulaks did deserve being killed], and if a mob of the third world’s poor rose up and killed middle class Americans (self included) we would very much deserve it too. My recognition of this simple reality is why I’m a communist, and your denial of it is why you cling so tightly to liberalism.

              • Snapz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I’m glad you linked source. Counter to what I perceive your intentions were, it actually shed light on how dishonest you had been in your representation of that previous comment as a part of the bigger conversation you’d had in that other thread - I’m only left to assume that you had hoped that nobody would read the source conversation in full and would instead see the basic presence of the URL and accept your own POV as fact.

                Frankly, I think you should be a bit ashamed that you tried to misrepresent ALL OF THAT INVOLVED CONVERSATION in the other thread with little-no larger context presented. All for an attempt at some minor “win” in this unrelated thread?

                To the dishonesty, YOU are actually the one who introduced the original premise of the “middle class being murdered” and in response, this person (in a bit of a passionate response, sure) engaged to reinforce a point they had been otherwise making throughout that fuller conversation - that American “success” in capitalism is zero sum, it always thrives on the backs of a set of conveniently ignored victims (throughout the third world especially). It IS something that we in the US conveniently ignore each and every day in the perceived “success” of capitalism, like averting your eyes and stepping over a houseless person to buy an $8 coffee. On a human level, yes, that is a horrible indefensible choice many of us make consistently to preserve a higher level of personal comfort when we could choose to do otherwise. The quiet guilt that the “wonders” of capitalism rightly have is why reagan had to make that famous speech where he told yuppies something akin to, “You don’t need to feel ashamed for owning your own fancy, personal swimming pool”

                I don’t agree with every position of that other poster, but there is definitely nuance here worth discussion every day - especially as the people who probably benefit the most (are a global level) from this broken system.

                It is a truly rare thing that you get someone actually educated and involved enough with a counter position to engaged in meaningful debate - for you to then betray that here by trying to reduce that entire interaction to your singular misrepresentation of a flawed point that you originated yourself ONLY makes the reader walk away with a deeper consideration of your opponent’s positions and a dismissal of your own assertions.

        • Crampon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Got brigaded I guess. Went from upvoted to downvoted pretty fast. Intence community. Guess there’s some radical discord or something. Enjoy your politics.

    • Turun@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s funny because the (far) left vilifies the police and then goes all surprised Pikachu when they turn out to not be manned by far left people.

      Idealism in all honor, but you’re not gonna change the system without being in control of the current power structures.