• spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    edit: the person im replying to unkindly edited their comment to make the following look snarky and rude. i’m leaving it up for posterity but just know it was more meaningful in the original context.

    if you think “tolerance is a contract” is too hard to understand yikes

    if you think it’s not worth it to persuade the moderates who haven’t yet succumbed to nazism that human rights can be protected, fucking yikes

    lukewarm, status-quo supporting comment 👎

    • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No. That third panel is terribly worded.

      You meant to say whatever is in your comment starting “yep! Pretty straightforward…” but whatever is in the actual image is meaningless and I even knew what you meant.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        they edited their comment say something totally different than what i responded to.

        i welcome a rewriting of the third panel. please be kind.

        • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Tolerance is a social contract and those who break the contract do not deserve tolerance. There is no paradox.” ?