• EpicVision@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    uBlock Origin has 36,000,000 users according to Google and ABP has 46,000,000 users. Another 13,000,000 use AdGuard and 67,000,000 use AdBlock (the crappy one, but nonetheless, it blocks YouTube ads).

    Also on Firefox there are 7,780,587 uBO users. Checkmate

    • EpicVision@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago
      Chrome Web Store Firefox Add-ons Microsoft Edge Add-ons Opera add-ons Total
      uBlock Origin 36,000,000 7,780,587 10,000,000 12,686,907 66,467,494
      uBlock Origin Lite 70,000 3,145 3,000 N/A 73,145
      uBlock 700,000 N/A ‪10,000 N/A 710,000
      AdNauseam N/A 74,478 10,000 210,616 295,094
      AdBlock Plus 46,000,000 4,064,146 10,000,000 50,844,211 110,908,357
      AdBlock 67,000,000 1,206,627 N/A N/A 68,206,627
      AdGuard 13,000,000 1,053,029 8,000,000 10,872,145 32,925,174
      Total 162,770,000 14,182,012 28,023,000 74,613,879 279,588,891

      Source: Official data from extension stores

      This table does not include Safari extensions, browser extensions installed through Linux package managers like the firefox-ublock-origin package on Arch Linux, browsers with built in adblockers like LibreWolf or Brave, modded YouTube mobile apps like Vanced/Revanced on Android, uYou for iOS, alternative frontends like Invidious or Piped, desktop clients like FreeTube, other mobile apps like Newpipe, Libretube or Yattee or other adblocking solutions.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use uBlock origin on firefox. All my devices are always connected through a VPN with all the ad and tracker blocks turned on.

      I am a YouTube premium subscriber.

      There are dozens of us… dozens!!!

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Same. It’s expensive, but there’s absolutely no question that I use YouTube enough to justify it. If some can’t afford it I understand and that’s different.

    • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Imagine being me and paying for premium and using ublock + revanced.

      At the end of the day, I think I get 10 dollars in value a month, and I know hosting data isn’t free.

      Edit: Right after I submitted I read the comment before me. Sorry about saying the exact same thing again 😅

      • EpicVision@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wouldn’t ever give Google a single penny. Instead, I pay for Nebula, allowing me to watch high quality videos and documentaries while supporting indie creators. And it’s just $5/month.

        • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not enough content on Nebula. I subscribed because of a couple YouRubers I follow, but there’s just not much there (at least that I watch).

          • EpicVision@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s definitely worth it. And it’s better to help independent creators instead of giving money to Google or other shady big tech companies.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thank you for being this way.

        I think platform greed is awful, but I think consumer greed is something that largely goes unacknowledged.

        Even though I’ve been ‘over’ the genre for more than a decade, I still buy Japanese shmups when they appear on Steam - at one time they could only be found on obscure JP Warez sites, forget legally here. I do it out of a sense of something owed for past joy, and never play the Steam ver.

        I’m also hypocritical to a degree. I can only afford to support so much and I don’t pay for everything, just what I would have paid for anyways. Perhaps there is some self-satisfying logic built in there lol

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    And it still doesn’t have sponsorblock. Free is more feature rich than paid. Hahaha

  • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s over a billion dollars a month. If they’re still operating at a loss with all that then it’s their own incompetence at fault.

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah I got it after some other lemming told me that you can get it for cheap with a family account. I pay 4 bucks per month now which apparently also supports YouTubers more than watching ads on their videos.

  • mihies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I might even consider it out if they weren’t selling me music as well and if there was a family option (in my country). And no, I wouldn’t consider VPN as I won’t do extra work to be able to pay google.

    • FlumPHP@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, as someone who gets good mileage with YouTube Premium, I wish they offered a version just for ads without music. YouTube music sucks hard, but I can’t justify paying for another music app on top of it.

    • SeabassDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had to get grayjay because revanced stopped working on an A13, but I can’t seem to find an auto play feature

  • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ll be honest. I did. With a VPN. It costs me $2.50 a month.

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Tell me more please? What hoops did you jump through to get it at this price? I can’t imagine it’s as simple as VPNing to a country where it’s cheaper.

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That is exactly what I did. If you Google it, you can find a list of the cheapest countries. Some of the cheaper options didn’t work for some reason related to how payments are processed in those places but I found one that went worked on the 3rd or 4th try.

        If I remember right, I was able to use Ukraine. I think Argentina is the cheapest around $1 a month.

        I’m happy to pay for product and services I use at reasonable prices. It makes me angry that they can offer this service for much less and still make.

        • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          How did you make payment? I assume you can’t just use your regular bank card?

          • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I just used my regular credit card. But I know you can get a prepaid card for international purposes like this. I don’t remember what that’s called. I think it’s green, lol.

            There’s a lot whole subreddit about getting YouTube premium for affordable prices with good info.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I do have YouTube Premium, because between the ad-free movies and TV shows and the music, the family sharing option was cheaper than Spotify and a couple of streaming services we gave up, and the few new content creators I do watch get paid more. But if they keep raising the price, I’ll look for something else.

    • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      For me, almost all the media I consume is YouTube so I’m fine paying up to a point but if it goes past 20 without a heap more features I’m out. I was already shocked they took away “continue watching” from normal users.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Hot on the heels of Google’s “One” subscription plan obtaining 100 million users, YouTube is also hitting that big milestone, with 100 million people paying for Premium and YouTube Music.

    YouTube’s subscription data didn’t make it into the earnings call three days ago.

    After warning users that ad blockers violate YouTube’s terms of service, the pop-ups show a big “try YouTube Premium” button.

    Premium also added an exclusive “enhanced bitrate” 1080p setting, although 2K, 4K, and 8K options have always been free.

    YouTube Music is free with ads and a more limited feature set, but subscribing gets you ad-free playback, background playback on phones, and access to YouTube Music streaming on Google’s various speakers.

    YouTube’s blog post highlights quotes from many big music industry CEOs celebrating the service.


    The original article contains 280 words, the summary contains 127 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • ripley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It went up like four bucks this month for me this past month. I feel like I am in a no-win situation. I want to support the authors of the videos and music I like, make the platform sustainable, and I hate ads and data harvesting. There doesn’t seem to be reasonable way to satisfy all three objectives (or even two).

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Patreon for the ones you really like, and substituting watching my own content on Plex is how I’m weening myself off YouTube.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m mostly in the same boat with supporting the creators, however I don’t really like Google to be honest. I end up supporting creators outside the platform, such as via Patreon or by watching on Nebula. Most of my YT consumption is done via NewPipe, Piped and Freetube

        There’s a little part of me that likes the fact that YouTube is burning a hole in Google’s finances tbh lol

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If it wasn’t as freaking high as it is there would be a lot more premium users. Every other streaming service is full of professionally made movies and TV shows. YouTube is absolutely chock-full of berate crap where they’re barely paying anybody but the top 1%. It’s a grift. It should be priced with the absolute cheapest services out there.

      • elgordio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        While YouTube doesn’t commission, much, content it does store disproportionately more data. A streaming site has maybe 1,000,000 hours of content. That amount of content is uploaded to YouTube every day. It’s a totally different business model.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          And, I don’t think I should be the one paying for that.

          They should charge minor storage fees to the creators and uploaders. You pay to put your content up there if people watch it you get paid back as many multiples as necessary. It would be a fantastic method to reduce the amount of trash video stored up there that nobody ever watches.

      • Technofrood@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The price makes a little more sense if you factor in it also includes YouTube music, which puts it more on par with a premium Spotify subscription, with the benefit of no ads on YouTube. Which is basically how I got YouTube premium, I was already paying a monthly fee for Google Play music as it was at the time, and the upgrade to add YouTube premium was only £2 extra a month.

          • borZ0 the t1r3D b3aR@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I agree with this sentiment completely. Not sure if they still do it or not, but YTM started out letting you upload your own music and then being able to access it across any device through the app. YTM doesn’t have the best catalog now, let alone when they started so i think the upload feature was a way of acknowledging that. I uploaded both local bands that are defunct and literally nowhere online and artists that didn’t embrace the internet age and restricted their catalogs. I can still listen to the music i uploaded back then through the app or a browser. That feature set it apart from the other options available at the time. I guess I’m trying to say that i also want to own my own music, but i dont hate the convenience of some of it floating in the cloud waiting for me to pull it down. Speaking of… ownCloud is dope and what i’m transitioning to for my media. When in doubt, roll your own solution.

  • eskimofry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    This “Article” is short on details, And according to this article Google did not reveal data about subscriptions in the recent earnings call. I can only think this a PR piece to fluff up Google’s shares and discourage critics. Unless Google can be confident enough to explain which regions added subscribers and how much of such a subscription was part of a bundle… We can’t conclude that their anti-adblocking measures and price hikes were successful.

    Example: India would fluff up numbers without adding as much revenue (bundles are common and subscription prices are low) than NA or EU