• PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Any predictions at this point are nothing more than wild speculation. Fuck’s sake, Putin’s personal caterer led a mercenary coup attempt on Moscow. How firm or how weak Putin’s grip on power is in light of absurdities like that is an absolute mystery to all of us on here. Hell, might be a mystery to the powers that be, and even Putin himself.

    The West attempted desperately to keep economic ties with Russia open until it was apparent that the war would not end quickly; the idea that the decisionmakers in our governments are drooling at the prospect of Russia falling apart and cratering trade for the next decade instead of desiring a quick return to normality is just… not in-line with the historic priorities of the post Cold-War West.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      More likely is that the prospect of hurting Russia too bad and it falling apart is one of the key drivers of the hesitation for more support.

      This was the line of reasoning:

      • Too little, Ukraine loses and Russia becomes enboldened and might try again.
      • Too much, option 1: Russia escalates and starts lobbying nukes.
      • Too much, option 2: Russia fractures from and internal powerstruggles and splits into several chaotic warring nuclear powered states.

      None of these options look appetizing.