• set_secret@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    bearly anyone who’s a boomer is playing these games or probs has ever played them short of seeing their kids boot it up. if anything these would be gen x shooters. People don’t seem to even know wtf a boomer is. boomer for gen z seems to = anyone over 40 lmao.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I claim gen x. I’m outside the range, but I have more in common with that gen than either millennials (my actual gen) or boomers (what everyone calls me). I mostly listen to classic rock (late 70s and 80s), still whine about removed MtG rules from the 90s, and my first video game systems were the Atari and NES.

          So if it’s okay I’ll just sit next to you. We don’t need to talk or anything though, I won’t be a bother.

    • Taokan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I had a good laugh when I noticed this tag on steam yesterday.

      I think the reality is, “boomer” as a term is here to stay and a moving target: as gen x ages into 40+, they’ll become boomers. One day when gen Z becomes old, they’ll be called boomers. At least here, there’s a fun double meaning to the term. For me, I came into the Doom franchise at Doom 2, at an age where what I played was still very much influenced by my parents and friends’ parents. So yes, Gen X were the primary player base, but it’s not unfair to say the boomers often paid for the game and maybe sat down to a round or two of it. And given that, it might have been one of the last games they were able to sit down and enjoy. I don’t know if anyone else experienced something similar, but my dad in the last 20 years of his life or so really locked in on the 1997 MTG: Shandalar game, and despite several computer upgrades along the way was never interested in any of the newer MTG digital offerings, preferring the cards and UI and experience he was familiar with. And while similar with Doom that game was played by many Gen X and Millenials, I think those demographics mostly continued to follow the franchise through newer releases: but maybe not the boomers.

      • Sendbeer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think the reality is, “boomer” as a term is here to stay and a moving target: as gen x ages into 40+

        This is a nitpick, but gen x moved into the 40+ age group long ago. As a gen Xer I’ll be in my 50’s later this year. 🤮

        And yeah, doom is peak Gen X probably.

        • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          In fact, millennials have begun turning 40 already. Not everybody agrees on generation cutoffs, but I don’t think there’s anyone who considers someone born in 1984 to still be Gen X.

      • Mmagnusson@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “boomer” as a term is here to stay and a moving target

        Kind of like how “Millennial” for a while meant ‘teenager’ despite the oldest Millennial being 40.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Technically, they’re all millennial shooters, because the entire genre was only invented in the 90s and mostly played by teenagers.

      In fact, boomers started a whole episode of “satanic panic” about them after it turned out that the Columbine shooters loved to play DOOM.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The first millenials were born in 1981, so yes, they were definitely teenagers by that point.

          • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Isn’t it 82? Whole reason they’re called millennials is because they graduated high school in the “new millennium”. 81 would have graduated in 99.

            • wjrii@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              There’s rarely a strict cutoff for this sort of thing. If you’re on the edges, it’s sort of “whichever feels right”. I am only a year older than my wife, and we were both born in the late 70s, but I had a brother 7 years older than me and she was her parents’ first. Based on the TikToks she sends me, she identifies as a millennial. I am much more in tune with the Gen X zeitgeist.

              • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Yeah the whole thing is just opinion and nothing official. Even Wikipedia 's definitions are based off others opinions. However to me, millennial makes sense as 82 and on being the first graduating classes of new millennium. I remember in elementary school they’d make such a huge deal about being the class of 2000.

                I’ve also seen another group cut into the early 80s as the Oregon Trail generation, as a way to for people who don’t associate well with Gen x or millennials.

        • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Nah dude. I’m a millennial, born in 80s. I was a teen in the 90s.

          Gen x was in their 20s. They were the ones making these games, for the most part.

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            John Carmack, one of the programmers of Doom, was 23 when Doom was released. (Born 1970)

            Just pitching in some additional info about who was making theses games.

    • BigBlackBuck@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wish this wasn’t the case. I’m im my 50s, my dad is in his 70s, we have a standing get together every week to play COD zombies. People sometimes look at me like I’m crazy when I bring it up, but we have so much fun. He’s played FPS probably more than I have. So many fathers and sons have lost their connections over the years, but as long as we can both pick up a controller, we are fucking some zombies up.

    • Ilflish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Boomer became an insult for anyone vaguely older then zoomer. Millennials are also called boomers if they are out of touch as well. Then boomer just meant old. More importantly Boomer ends with er and so is more fun to say as Boomer Shooter over GenX shooter or old shooter of classic shooter.

      But this comment has big Boomer energy according to zoomers

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m not sure if the name stems from the Baby Boomers or, like, “BOOM! Headshot!” Because Doom and even Wolfenstein were the games of my very millennial youth, and didn’t exist for most of most Boomer’s life time.

    That said, my dad (who is a boomer) played the shit out of Doom and Heretic. But stopped when Quake came out and everything started centering around aiming with the mouse. He always used the mouse to move. 🤢

    • ZOSTED@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s just because they’re old. I’ve got told “ok boomer” for complaining about lines of source code longer than 80 characters.

        • ZOSTED@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Haha yeah I’ve seen the error of my ways.

          But seriously I think it varies by use case. “Tight” languages like golang, python, ruby, or most backends (other than Java)? Going over 80 is a bit of a smell. But if we’re talking about a React frontend? Then yeah, an 80 character limit is obnoxious.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Nah, Python is a little verbose at times, so 100 is a bit better, especially for longer comprehensions with an if clause. Our team uses keyword parameters pretty much everywhere, so a lot of regular function calls wrap even at our 120-line limit (I’m trying to push us toward positional-only args to keep it under control).

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It really depends on the use case. Scripting? 80 should suffice. Writing a complete program with classes, methods in classes, calling methods of variables, chaining method calls… 80 is very punishing. Even 130 is punishing for some pyspark methods. To apply line limits , you end up dividing calls in separate lines, which in turn makes the whole file much, much larger. Doing to it for the times it happens in 130 lines is completely fine, but with 80 a 800 lines file would be converted to 2000 at minimum. That’s not good.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, you can’t do a headshot in Doom because there’s no vertical look. So it’s either a reference to older people (ok boomer) or the ridiculous explode-y weapons you get and the general feeling of blasting through hordes of baddies. I’m guessing it’s the older people term, since modern shooters look nothing like Doom.

      • cannache@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        True I think there was a big gap somewhere in the years between when o.g. 2.5d retro shooters like Doom, Blood, and Hexen players got used to moving with mouse look, and the people who played shooters like Quake, UT and counterstrike back in 2000-2005 where we aimed with the mouse and strafe run with the left and right keyboard buttons.

        A few other hidden gems back in the day that I never got around to playing until years later after their prime time was probably Descent, System Shock and also AvP.

        Those were the days alright

    • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It comes from a few years ago. Some team making a boomer shooter weren’t sure what genre they wanted to advertise it as, since just plain “first person shooter” is saturated. One of them saw the original DOOM described on twitter as “some kinda boomer-ass shooter” and thought it was hilarious, so they went with it.

  • Mike@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lol I thought the genre was called boomer shooter because you have an arsenal of guns that go boom while circle strafing and holding the mouse button.

  • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    On a semi-related note: Is there a commonly agreed upon term for games like ‘Vampire Survivors’ yet and does it have its own tag on Steam?

    So far, I’ve only found ‘Action Roguelike’, but that one has a lot of games that are, well, action based Roguelikes, like ‘Binding of Isaac’ and ‘Risk of Rain’.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    What was wrong with calling them doom clones? That’s what they were called until gen z made OK boomer a meme

        • cannache@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          No Quake was a real level up from Doom, at least graphics wise.

          Though I actually preferred the sprite graphics for smaller monsters, what I reckon would have been cool is if we could have a retro reboot of Doom 2 but with Quake style 3d monsters for mini bosses, and a whole Hexen remix/mashup but with UT style grenades and low gravity jumps and stuff

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you call the whole genre doom clones then that means Doom is a doom clone. Kind of like the problem with ‘Souls-like’ games. Also calling them clones somewhat diminishes the accomplishments and inmovations of the devs within the genre.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              It should be:

              • permadeath
              • randomized runs (maps and equipment)
              • usually grid-based movement

              The last seems to be an unpopular definition though.

              • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Also some people would add not having upgrades or unlocks of any kind that persist between runs for a game to be considered a true roguelike, the idea being it’s you the player who learns and gets better to eventually be able to beat the game, and not because you failed 50 runs to eventually unlock enough hp and damage upgrades.

                Which is why the “correct” term for most of the games is roguelite and not -like.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yup, that’s what I mean by permadeath, you start each run from scratch, though you may unlock access to content (i.e. open a new area, unlock a class, etc) that the next play through can access.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I disagree, it’s informative.

        Maybe Doom-like is better, since “clone” implies they didn’t add anything. It has worked really well for rogue-like, and souls-like has also evolved a bit to not just be “like dark souls,” but any game with a focus on hard boss fights.

        • SharkAttak@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          TBH thou, like “millennials” has replaced “young’ins” for boomers, the same can be for millennials, “boomers” replacing “old man”.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yup, my parents are right smack in the middle of the boomer gen ('50s) and we recently celebrated my dad’s 70th birthday by going on a cruise. They’re still somewhat active, but we still needed to take their age account (we did a couple small hikes as excursions).

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The joke is that younger generations refer to anything older than them as boomer. Hence boomer shooter.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s really disappointing. Boomers did not make or play doom clones.

  • Pistcow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Weird. Considering us folk born in the early 80s got lumped with millennial. I was playing all the doom and doom clones in the library in middleschool.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yup, I’m a later 80s millennial, but I’m the youngest of four and my oldest sibling is at the top end of gen x, so I played lots of 80s and 90s games because that’s what we had available (first consoles were an Atari and NES).

      I played Doom as a kid and I played gzdoom as late as college with friends, it’s great fun! In fact, if someone mentions “Doom” in a conversation, I think of OG Doom, not 2016 Doom.

  • Executive Chimp@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Has anybody else noticed that boomer isn’t the correct generation for this nomenclature? It’s like people aren’t using words literally or something.

  • headset@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    I call anyone younger than me a “coomer” and any unnecessarily complicated rougue fps is a “coomer shooter”. Does your game have a timer to purposely slow you down? Coomer game. I feel like the word “coomer” really captures the lifestyle and essence of today’s unintelligent and entitled kids.