• Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I see ads in TV that are pro Isreal now with Santa crying because of Hamas kidnapped people. I know it’s what about ism but not really moral high ground here when IDF literally wipes whole familes.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Its not what-about-ism.

      Being accused of attacking civilians and saying the enemy is attacking civilians to divert attention is what-about-ism.

      Crying that the enemy is attacking civilians while you are also attacking civilians is hypocrisy.

      Calling out your own/allied government for attacking civilians and trying to hold them accountable even if the enemy attacks civilians as well is being a good person.

    • thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      What Where are those ads Here we dont have anything similar and we would prolly wont even accept it

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s a billboard in San Diego trying to convince commuters that Hamas is their problem too. Which is completely ridiculous.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    At what point does this go from being a counter terrorist operation to a genocide?

  • thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    A lot of comments are saying that hamas hides behind civilians but from what I see and read hamas and civilians are a melting pot that is interwined due to the extreme oppression in gaza strip. Any palestinian civilian could understand and help or even just not condemn totally hamas due to their conditions and prolly Israel gladly label as hamas any slightly suspect palestinian top

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you know that your enemy is hiding behind civilians and still kill the civilians, you’re the bad guy.

      It’s a piss poor excuse for murder.

      • InformalTrifle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        So don’t retaliate? I think the Israeli response is over the top but should they never respond if their attackers fire from within civilian areas and don’t care at all about civilians on their own side?

      • thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes is basically what i said in the last sentence. Sometimes u just can’t untie civilians and fighters, especially when you are actively radicalizing civilians daily

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sometimes u just can’t untie civilians and fighters,

          Then you figure out another way of getting to your enemy. There are rules to War.

          You don’t get a ‘get out of jail free card’ excuse to murder civilians.

          especially when you are actively radicalizing civilians daily

          Bombing them in refugee camps will do the same thing. That is, if they survive the bombing.

          • thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Wait maybe I am expressing myself wrong, I agree with you 100% and all the words i was writing were to confirm your pov :)

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Wait maybe I am expressing myself wrong, I agree with you 100% and all the words i was writing were to confirm your pov :)

              Astroturfers will use debating tactics like seeming to be positive about a point while actually wording it so that it comes off as slightly negative, etc., especially so if they’re expecting a lot of pushback.

              I wasn’t sure if you were doing that or not, but the ‘attitude’ of my reply was based on your original comment…

              A lot of comments are saying that hamas hides behind civilians but from what I see and read hamas and civilians are a melting pot that is interwined due to the extreme oppression in gaza strip. Any palestinian civilian could understand and help or even just not condemn totally hamas due to their conditions and prolly Israel gladly label as hamas any slightly suspect palestinian top

              In your original comment you didn’t specify your own opinion of why that was right/wrong, you just stated it as fact, and left us to assume either way.

              So my suggestion would be next time to elaborate more with a second paragraph, either agreeing or disagreeing with what you stated in the first paragraph.

              • Bayz0r@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                In their defense, it was pretty clear to me what they meant from the get-go and your replies seemed unnecessarily hostile.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  In their defense, it was pretty clear to me what they meant from the get-go and your replies seemed unnecessarily hostile.

                  I truly don’t think I was being unnecessarily hostile, as I did assume they were astroturfing in a stealthy sort of way (as I described). For that matter, the fact that you’re defending them makes me suspect that you too are astroturfing to protect them.

                  The onus is on the speaker/commentor to speak fully, if they want to be understood fully, so that assumptions are not made, and misunderstanding do not happen. Trust me, I learned about that recently myself here on Lemmy lol.

                  I stand by what I said.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Though You’re mostly right, it’s missing a key part: the Israeli government has actively worked to make it this way, sponsoring Hamas with money and help because they wanted this. If you have an extremist organization so intertwined in the civil population, you can just go and murder them all.

      Hamas is evil, but the Israeli government is arguably worse

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The only world record you do not want to achieve without looking like a complete monster. And yet Israel managed to do just that.

    • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is not even close to the world record. Killing 250 people in a day isn’t good, obviously, but it is not even a rounding error compared to real warfare.

      Just considering conventional weapons, the firebombing of Tokyo on the night of 9–10 March, 1945 killed approximately 100,000 people.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m pretty sure this is a war. At least I’ve heard Israeli officials describe the current conflict as a war on Hamas. I don’t know of any war in which civilians aren’t negatively affected.

          Israel can’t really stop fighting Hamas yet. According to the BBC, Hamas is still receiving new weapons via their tunnel system. They apparently also have an extensive weapons manufacturing system within Gaza itself.

  • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    “with Palestinian authorities reporting that 250 people have been killed”

    Palestinian authorities (at least in Gaza) = Hamas. But I’m sure they have no reason to lie.

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Only 250 Palestinians in 24 hours? ngl, that sounds like rookie numbers for Israel.

    Come on guys, the Holocaust was proof that one can do better! Don’t aim to just be equal to the nazis, Israel; aim to surpass them!