Last time this happened they said they don’t interfere in state election law. Surely they wouldn’t change their minds now that it’s a liberal state SC ruling would they…?
Last time this happened they said they don’t interfere in state election law.
Because I’m curious, what case was that? I’d really like to read it over and see how the concepts could apply to the Section Three ruling that came out of Colorado and will most certainly be appealed to SCOTUS.
This is the Wisconsin Supreme Court, not the U.S. Supreme Court. And it has a liberal majority, which is why they ordered new maps.
GOP is appealing to the US SC the article says.
Last time this happened they said they don’t interfere in state election law. Surely they wouldn’t change their minds now that it’s a liberal state SC ruling would they…?
Because I’m curious, what case was that? I’d really like to read it over and see how the concepts could apply to the Section Three ruling that came out of Colorado and will most certainly be appealed to SCOTUS.