The law ( the Leahy Law) requires that the US vet any foreign military receiving US arms. However, that doesn’t happen with Israel

  • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    7 months ago

    Because it turns turns billions in public funds into billions in private profits.

    The fact that those profits come at the expense of children’s lives doesn’t worry the oil and gas industries, so why would it worry weapons manufacturers?

    • GutsBerserk@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      A sad and horrifying reality. The biggest success of Zionism is that it has hidden itself behind antisemitism.

  • spider@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Why is the US still sending an endless supply of arms to Israel without conditions?

    AIPAC

    • sirboozebum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the actual answer.

      This lobby group is extremely effective and any legislator that opposes them will see their primary or electoral opponents get millions of dollars in funding.

      • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Look, AIPAC sucks but do you guys really think we wouldn’t be dumping weapons into the middle east if it weren’t for the Israel lobby? Like the US government doesn’t have its own reasons for doing so?

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Obviously the US government is sending an endless supply of arms to Israel without conditions because doing so serves its purposes.

    The question that you need to ask is how it serves its purposes - how is it that the US government benefits by enabling Israel’s Palestinian genocide.

    My theory, also supported by other US government actions in the Middle East (such as the Iraq war) is that the US government’s overall goal in the Middle East is destabilization.

    And that stands to reason, since the Middle East’s wealth administered by stable and progressive governments rather than reactionary autocracies could he a threat to western hegemony.

    Or more simply, a Middle East consumed by strife can’t be stable, and thus can’t invest sufficient time and resources into being a serious player on the world stage, since too much of its time and resources is diverted into dealing with internal strife, or pissed away by the dysfunctional governments that have come to power as a result of of the strife.

    And Israel, and specifically the overt violence and oppression and now genocide failing to hide behind a shabby mask of “defense” and “security” in which Israel continues to engage, is key to that strife.

    If you look at US foreign policy in the Middle East through that lens - asking yourself, at every turn, how does this accord with the presumption that the broad goal of the US government in the Middle East is destabilization, then a lot of things that don’t make sense otherwise suddenly do.

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Like someone else said here, it funnels public money into private profits. What I do not get however is this system only furthers inequality which is going to snap the system at some point to the detriment of all, including the billionaires who will increasingly be in a hostile environment. Why shit on your own doorstep when you could make it better for all including yourself and your family. Really foolish thinking but oh well, as really, we seem absolutely committed to this dark path.

    • cerement@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      short term profits trump long term savings, none of these people can see beyond the end of the quarter

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s an easy answer. If you’re rich enough, you have private security and a mansion with acres of land surrounded by razor wire. You won’t feel a thing.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe if you have private security robots unconnected to the internet. Maybe they do, I don’t know.

    • GutsBerserk@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      These billionaires think they and theirs are above everything. They can kill millions without a real danger to them and theirs. Lack of fear.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    There is a rare debate taking place in mainstream foreign policy circles, including among congressional Democrats, about whether the United States should condition its military support for Israel in light of the massive civilian casualties it has caused in Gaza.

    According to a recent report in the Israeli media, however, the Biden administration has begun doing exactly that – putting conditions on continued US support for Israel’s war on Gaza.

    “[It] would be too resource-intensive – and that’s fair to some extent – to essentially vet the entire Israeli security apparatus for gross violations of human rights,” Josh Paul, a former senior state department official responsible for foreign arms transfers, explained on The Lawfare Podcast last week.

    “The department has never concluded that a gross violation of human rights occurred, despite what I would say is incredibly credible and convincing evidence to the contrary,” Paul added.

    The Leahy Law is just one of many safeguards meant to stop foreign governments from using American weapons to commit human rights violations and war crimes.

    Just two months before the Hamas attacks that led to this brutal round of fighting, the state department instructed embassies worldwide to monitor and report all incidents of harm to civilians involving American-made arms.


    The original article contains 848 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I think a lot of U.S. politicians and legacy media outlets were genuinely caught off-guard by the backlash. Prior to the Netanyahu era, support for Israel in the U.S. was basically non-controversial. But he fucked that up just like he fucks up everything else.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Netanyahu has been an unmitigated disaster in every conceivable way, for a long time. The Israeli people really need to kick him to the curb.

      I mean, at this point he’s squandering good will and sympathy generated for Israel after a terrorist group specifically targeted civilians for rape, torture, and murder. It feels like something that should be impossible - I mean, it’s not like anyone sane would side with freaking Hamas.

      If you’re opposed to Hamas, it should be trivially easy to maintain the moral and political high ground over them. Yet he’s somehow failing even that.

      Cripes, what a clusterfuck.

      • cerement@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I keep reposting this one quote: “The bar to clear was on the ground and y’all brought shovels.”

    • Guydht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re not antisemitic, you’re just stupid.

      When the next Holocaust happens (we can see the world persecuting Jews in these very months…), and Israel will be the only one to save you, turn them down, because you obviously hate them so much.