• mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, Hamas storing weapons in Hospitals has been an open secret for years now and has been reported on by multiple news outlets for years.

    The organization should have refused to serve in hospitals that doubled as weapons depots, jails and torture centers.

    By not doing so, they choose sides in the conflict and make themselves legitimate military targets.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you think Hamas gave yours to these doctors to show them and they all just kept quiet.

      Sure, there were unconfirmed rumours but Israel’s intelligence service struggles to prove it for a long time. To me that confirms hidden and unknown location.

      It’s also rumoured that Bibi was aware of the attach coming. Is that now assumed confirmed, just because it’s an open secret?

      Msf offer medical services. They don’t pick sides. Adding the injured in any location is not picking sides. Hamas using the hospitals as a shield is terrible and undermines their independence and safety. Israel targeting them without due care for the injured within is a war crime.

      • mwguy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Msf offer medical services. They don’t pick sides.

        If you’re working in a military installation you’ve chosen a side. Thats the point.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand the point. I just disagree. If terrorists took over a hospital, Die Hard style, do you think the doctors are now terrorists if they continue to see patients? That’s not how it works. Hamas is both a terrorist organisation and the de facto government so the line is even more blurry. There aren’t an abundance of other health facilities the doctors can work from. That’s part of the reason msf is there, a lack of suitable health workers and facilities for the population. Even more so in a warzone.

          • mwguy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they took over the hospital a decade ago and you continued to operate in it? Yes absolutely. It’s not like this is something that just happened prior to the war. Doctors without borders could have raised a stink in 2016 until August of this year about it but they chose not to.

            There aren’t an abundance of other health facilities the doctors can work from.

            Then you don’t work there. Doctors without borders manages to operate in war zones all across the world without operating in military depots. If Palestinians don’t want their help there are millions of underserved people across the world who need their help and won’t force them to compromise their neutrality.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They is who? The government? Hamas the terrorists? Hamas the health authority?

              Yes msf should just abandon Gaza hospitals altogether based on unconfirmed rumors (at the time) of the hospitals being used for weapon storage. Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?

              MSF work in the environment that is available to them, wherever that is. Hamas is the elected government in Palestine. It just happens the last elections are 20 years ago and half are under 18.

              Not operating there since 2007 would be taking a side, which, again, they don’t do. They treat patients.

              You’re right, I don’t work for MSF. When I started the volunteer process, a minimum commitment was 2 years and I could not commit to that. I was not looking at Gaza, but Africa.

              The whole point of the name is to say they are non political. You kind of don’t seem to understand the practical implications of that and require a purity of apolitical stance that does not exist in a warzone, or even a stable democracy.

              • mwguy@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                They is who?

                The die hard style terrorist you suggested in the previous comment.

                based on unconfirmed rumors (at the time) of the hospitals being used for weapon storage.

                They should have demanded the right to inspect the facilities because they were “unconfirmed” only because it made the Jews look good. A report like that coming from anywhere else by outlets like Reuters and the BBC would be seen as fact unless proven otherwise.

                MSF work in the environment that is available to them, wherever that is.

                There are plenty of places they could be where they’re not. They’ve hardly saturated the worldwide need for charity doctoring. A volunteer stationed in Palestine is one you can’t station in Ethiopia, Hati, etc…

                Every doctor in Palestine could be doing just as much good elsewhere in the world.

                Not operating there since 2007 would be taking a side, which, again, they don’t do. They treat patients.

                If they had refused to serve in military depots; Hamas would have either been forced to provision them a safe place to work. Ignoring your integrity is choosing a side too.

                and require a purity of apolitical stance that does not exist in a warzone, or even a stable democracy.

                Honestly, “don’t operate in a military installation” is hardly a purity test. Even in active wars the Red Cross will establish field hospitals that doctors like this could work out of and remain apolitical.

                • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Re: they. If you don’t see the nuance between the different options I offered, perhaps you need to research more.

                  You are referring to Israel as “the Jews”. Israel and Judaism are two seperate things. Many Jewish people are critical of Israel. Many Jewish people are suffering from anti semitism due to acts of Israel.

                  You offer alternatives for them to work, forgetting of course there is corruption and malfeasance in all the alternatives you offered. Does working in those countries mean they support that? Logical consistency would mean they do.

                  Once again, the hospitals in Gaza are not military depots. They are I’ll equipped hospitals. Terrorists may have used the rules of war to hide things there, as destroying civilian hospitals is against the rules of war. The fact they did is a war crime. Bombing them is also a war crime. Working there as a doctor, with no links to terrorism is just that, being a doctor.

                  Abandoning a whole nation of people as there are terrorists among them is an easy way to abandon all apolitical medical help. They could not operate anywhere.

                  • mwguy@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Re: they. If you don’t see the nuance between the different options I offered, perhaps you need to research mor

                    I’m always down to rewatch diehard. But what version of it spans two decades again? Is that the director’s cut?

                    Once again, the hospitals in Gaza are not military depots.

                    This war has definitively proven this to be a false statement. Please re-evaluate your position based on updated data.

                    Abandoning a whole nation of people as there are terrorists among them is an easy way to abandon all apolitical medical help. They could not operate anywhere.

                    Emphasis mine. This is objectively untrue. There are many impoverished places on the planet that will not use a hospital as a weapons depot. In fact, the majority of impoverished places that need doctors without borders are willing to do this.