• Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know how rich people go “I earn so much money, I can’t even spend it all” and such?

    Yeah, how the fuck have we not put 2 and 2 together and not tax the shit out of them? Oh yeah, we let them buy out the legislation.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s not that they can’t it’s that if they did they wouldn’t be rich.

      Rich can be cured by a weekend in Vegas. Wealthy is terminal.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rich can be cured by a weekend in Vegas. Wealthy is terminal.

        If a Vegas weekend can “cure it”, that ain’t rich.

        But I think Chris Rock said it best: “Shaq is rich. The old white guy signing his paychecks is wealthy.”

  • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Noo that’s Socialism you can’t just prioritize society over capital

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah. just like most things in life, the only way to make things better is to ignore them and pretend they don’t have problems.

  • metaStatic@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    you don’t need to tax the rich for universal healthcare

    source: literally every country with universal healthcare already

      • Zorg@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US already overall spends more than enough on healthcare, to fund universal care for everyone. But that fat inflated money pool, needs to pay for a ton of wasteful expenses that have nothing to do with healthcare (billing, insurance sales, people who bounce documents and phone calls back & forth to the insurance companies; and of course profit extraction).

        Tax the rich to pay for infrastructure, green energy projects, UBI or other help to the poorest & working poor …heck even throwing billions at fusion energy research, will create a lot more economic activity and be money better spent; than letting the psychopathic wealth hording dragons keep their missions of gold.

      • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t think they have anything against it, their point seemed more like. “If they wanted to implement healthcare, they aren’t being stopped by not taxing them rn”

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    If America had universal healthcare they’d actually need to tax less because it is the more efficient system.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    America already pays more per capita into their Medicare/Medicaid system then most countries with universal healthcare. Just stop adding an extra zero to every line item on a medical bill and you will cover the cost of universal healthcare.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Private insurers and unlimited spending from big pharma lobbyists ensure US politicians keep those extra 0s right where they are, and that we get worse medical outcomes as a bonus on top.

      Besides, the capitalists want us dependent on jobs for healthcare. Much easier to manipulate and exploit the workers that way.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I fucking hate that whole hospital wings are named after rich people as if they are doing something good for this world.

    Those hospital wings are paid for by ill-gotten gains

    Just keep that money in the public purse to begin with and fund the hospital properly instead of waiting for some billionaire to jerk himself off with “philanthropy”

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now take that sentiment to a logical example and criticize the Gates Foundation and watch the downvotes and ad-hominem pour in.

    • Poggervania@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      fund the hospital properly instead of waiting for some billionaire to jerk himself off with “philanthropy” a tax break

      Fixed your comment for ya :p

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m totally fine with taxing the fuck out of billionaires, but imo I think corporations need more attention when it comes to taxation. Trillion dollar companies exist. There shouldn’t even be billion dollar companies.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Y’all. This is a wildly simplistic take. We could take every penny from every American billionaire and not even get close.

    We have to tax high-income folks, corporations, etc. We have to roll back the Trump tax cuts.

    And more importantly, we have to craft a solid message. And yes, that means emotional propaganda, not facts. Democrats have to SELL this. Facts don’t sell. Emotions sell.

    Remember all the low-income idiots freaking out over Biden wanting to raise taxes on incomes over $400,000? We can laugh about how dumb those people are, but we aren’t winning votes.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The top 10% of families in America hold 76% of the country’s wealth. You are the one giving the incorrect and simplistic take.

      You can absolutely fund tons of important measures by taking from the rich.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m talking about billionaires, not the top 10%. Those are wildly different groups.

        You want to talk about taxing the snot of of the 10%, I’m game.