• Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Losing your ad blocker on chrome is “just under” software designed to kill people? Lol really? Oh the oppression

    • seang96A
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure it won’t kill people like programming drones, but it is still unethical and would affect ~5 billion people negatively.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but you said “just under”. There’s a preeetty fuckin wide gap between blocking ad blockers and dropping bombs guy.

        • seang96A
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. It’s not just ad blockers that is m issue with this. Read Mozilla’s post for a bunch of valid concerns.
          2. If you read my reply there is a comma prior to the just which makes a pause if it makes it better you could read it as [it’s] just under… Either way I am not trying to make the wide gape you are referring to, I was simply stating it as a matter of fact more ethical then programming for military use but still unethical.
          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not saying concerns aren’t valid, I just took your comment to be calling it almost comparable to military software.

            “…, it’s just under…” means the same thing, but I think you mean “it’s just under” as in “although, it’s under” rather than “just” being a measurement?