• 5 Posts
  • 793 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle


  • seang96AtoAnnouncements@lemmy.mlLemmy AMA March 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is a k8s cluster and using ceph for all of my storage so the latency from that I bet is the largest reason and upping the memory offsets the disk writes. i also have another postgres DB syncing as a fallback for high availability. Fortunately after tuning the database and giving it enough RAM my instance has been running pretty stable for over a year without any changes.

    I am also using less powerful computers for the entire infrastructure (not server grade) which brings to the point of having horizontal scaling on database I imagine will be a growing need with growing instances, communities, and users since it can be cheaper to run multiple smaller spec servers rather than a single with the added benefit of high availability.


  • seang96AtoAnnouncements@lemmy.mlLemmy AMA March 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah I used pgtune as a base and found more memory needed to be assigned to certain spots especially to keep federation with bigger instances, otherwise timeouts would occur resulting in my instance being constantly behind.

    That said I read postgres 17 is much more memory efficient, though I have yet to move my lemmy database to it yet since its the largest haha.


  • seang96AtoAnnouncements@lemmy.mlLemmy AMA March 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    On the server perspective, I have a question, what are your thoughts for horizontal scaling on the database? This seems to be the biggest limitation and requiring higher spec hardware to scale especially for the bigger instances.

    My tiny instance for example I give over 20GB of RAM just to postgres to make it perform efficient enough.





  • seang96AtoCyberstuck@lemmy.caTop quality
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Mine has a remote update functionality that has yet to be used! I think it only is for updated to the screens, anything else needs physical udates, I assume those are firmware upgrades on specific components.





  • I imagine it’d make the business more expensive low orbit satelites slowly fall into the atmosphere and are supposed to burn up after a couple of years. I imagine with lower orbits that they’d fall sooner and you’d have to launch more to sustain your system which then produces more pollution and perpetuates the problem.

    Edit article says more space junk and slower burning up in the atmosphere as an effect so that’s interesting. If it becomes a space junk graveyard I imagine satellites will more frequently get damaged by them and become junk themselves?



  • Passkey doesn’t require biometrics necessarily. Password managers are adding support for them, so you can use bitwarden for example which supports password and a security device combo to login and use the passkeys. Passkeys should be more secure than passwords in a password manager since it would only allow using it in the proper domain preventing attacks like opening malicious links in emails or typos when typing a domain manually.

    That said a lot of the current approaches to passkeys do use biometric / pin to unlock so you gotta find what’s right for your OPSEC values.

    All that said, the article seems pretty bad.












Moderates