• Amilo159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I started watching DS9 for the first time couple of months ago. It is very good but visuals are quite dated (just finished season 1).

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, DS9 it is then. I know it’s hard to survive the first two seasons, but it’ll be worth it.

      • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m convinced that many people don’t appreciate DS9 until their 30s.

        Cool that the 90s shows each seem to appeal to different demographics even though they were all in theory designed for mass audiences ( unlike in the current streaming era).

        The problem seems to be that a lot of younger fans that get into Voyager & TNG, just cringe at DS9 or find it boring. Once they’ve had that experience they’re hard to convince to give it a fresh shot when they’re older.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think many of us feel that DS9 is one of those shows where each season is an improvement on the one before it. So it starts out pretty mundane at best with some terrible episodes, but by the final season it’s pretty incredible.

        • Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.websiteOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          My issue with the show extends throughout all seasons, unfortunately. There’s a few reasons as to why I am not interested but they’re all personal opinion. No serious complaints about the shows quality overall.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ll take DS9’s first two seasons over TNG’s first two any time. Yes, even Move Along Home. TNG also peaked around season 5, and was somewhat more mixed after that (but never going quite so low, either).

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m more forgiving of TNG because it was breaking new ground. DS9 had years of TNG to build itself on. It should have come swinging right out of the gate. There are fewer bad DS9 episodes overall than bad TNG episodes in my opinion, but I will forgive TNG for being rocky at the start, especially when control was continually being wrestled between Roddenberry, Hurley and Berman.

            Also, I think there are a lot of excellent season 2 episodes for TNG and I think Pulaski is a highly underrated character. One of the few who develops as the season progresses and doesn’t regress. She slowly begins to admire Data and eventually accepts him as a fellow crewmember and not just a robot. You also had classic episodes like Elementary, Dear Data.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree on Pulaski. She could have been a great character if she had more than one season.

              I don’t think there’s a truly great episode in TNG’s first two seasons, though. They range from “utter garbage” to “fine” . Season three is massive improvement. Watching it back to back, it’s almost jarring how much better it gets. Barely seems like the same show.

              DS9 ranges from “I’ll watch it, I guess” to “holy shit this is amazing”. Kai Winn is a fantastic villain straight away, and would be the most talked about villain in any other show. The only reason she isn’t is because there are so many great villains in DS9 that she gets lost.