Again, that’s not what I said. The context was “from a legal standpoint”, which is still accurate regardless of how you feel about it.
Hi I’m Lala! Hobby artist/law grad
Again, that’s not what I said. The context was “from a legal standpoint”, which is still accurate regardless of how you feel about it.
I swear I almost had a stroke trying to read this headline.
Yeah I’m pretty sure I didn’t say that but okay.
The point is you shouldn’t have to depend on the whims of random people being willing to help you, when you are paying money for the airline already to do this job for you. Part of the airline’s literal job is to make sure you’re safe while you’re traveling.
This sounds an awful lot like victim blaming, and you’re advocating for what here? For random passengers to step in and beat this guy? If the airline attendants couldn’t control him, why should passengers need to step in? These women should rely on the random willingness of strangers to protect them? Also from a legal standpoint, other passengers do not owe a duty of care to other passengers. Only the airline has a legal duty to protect their passengers. So these people should absolutely should sue the shit ouf of this airline, because they negligently allowed an unruly passenger to continue harrassing other passengers for an entire flight when they were the only ones with a legal obligation to act.
This is hilarious, it’s going to get the shit griefed out of it.
Ooooor this person is just terrible at cutting bangs.
I get that this is probably a fake scenario for a joke but it’s not even particularly funny? What’s the punchline anyway, “haha I fucked up my kids hair and now it looks like shit lol lol”? Peak boomer humor.
It’s fascinating to see how a comic from 1912 still holds up today. Also I didn’t know they had ‘colored moving pictures’ that early, I always thought Wizard of Oz was the first one in 1939. Turns out 1908 was the year the first color film came out. Neat!