Thanks! I will use that one.
Thanks! I will use that one.
Makes sense. Sometimes only once out into reality then only we’ll know if it is a great idea, or not. But it doesn’t hurt to have the tools to try. Those who want really high quality stuffs can go to the humans (and pay them good money) to make it even better.
I personally think maybe it’s also in need of quality posts or engagement, but in larger quantities.
That said I know my post may not be quality input, but this is how I feel.
That might just push Taiwan into wanting more independence.
oh boy, if the shares are low enough Vivendi will eventually be able to do a hostile takeover (and that isn’t a good thing either).
Well, Ubisoft dropped the ball hard. (or balls)
This is very powerful. I mean the entire phrasing. The judge certainly did not muck around! (BTW, non American here, but I like the choice of words and phrases he used in his sentencing)
Not an American, but I did buy digital books on Amazon and Kindle.
Have you seen the new ruling about games from California? Doest that apply to ebooks (since its digital goods?) Or not?
The feature is impressive if you want a primer into discussing the sources of materials or a gloss over kind of preview of the materials.
To game it to do in depth stuffs, I heard it was possible but you need to do a few things. Sadly I don’t.
Still, I did try it for most new documents I receive and wanting to get an overview and I must say I’m not disappointed (even if it’s very superficial in my use cases)
I wish you the best of luck with your endeavours!