![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://spgrn.com/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
Wastelands 3; that’s a fuck no.
Bonus: depends on if it comes with super powers. If yes, then no. If no, then fuck no.
Bonus bonus: probably not, but I’d think about it for hours every night.
Wastelands 3; that’s a fuck no.
Bonus: depends on if it comes with super powers. If yes, then no. If no, then fuck no.
Bonus bonus: probably not, but I’d think about it for hours every night.
Dealing with an enormous corporation with an extensive track record of exploiting similar scenarios and acting on bad faith…
Yeah, it’s pretty rational to believe this time will also be reflective of their general modus operandi.
You’ve mounted an emphatic defense of Facebook based almost exclusively on the fact people in this thread don’t know exactly the technical details of what fuckery they’ll be up to this time. I’m left wondering if you have any understanding of people, history, or… context as a concept.
You have provided a good sounding board for others to illustrate just what the risks involved are. So, thank you for that.
It would exacerbate the swing but wouldn’t change the result
And I don’t think maliciously compliant mod is interested in statistical representation.
TOS can change at their whim. Even if the TOS started out decent it would change as soon as they were established. Severing threads once the user base is entrenched would be much more difficult than not allowing federation from the start.