raven [he/him]

Close enough that you should be embarrassed. You try to punch left and you find yourself sounding like a chud. Funny how that works.

You said the one joke™

I’ve been on sway since 2019 and I’ve had fewer issues than I did on i3. The performance was an immediate improvement. Feels silky smooth like x never did. Stable as a rock.

Why don’t you just install it alongside X?

Laugh it up. It’ll be gone from our end momentarily.

Oops I meant to put that in the report box, because this isn’t allowed on hexbear.

Ableist misogynist language

And it would be so much easier to not give a shit about any of that. You really don’t get anything for standing up for the powerless (aside from the fact that our trans posters are among the most powerful ever known).

Removed by mod

Audacious has a winamp mode and supports winamp skins.

Talking past them is still valid and worthwhile in a lot of cases.

The opinion:
“Homophobia and white supremacy are bad and should be combated”

It’s interesting that you think firefox is being “controversial” when their CEO writes a couple paragraphs about combating hate speech online, but brave isn’t when their CEO sends money to hate organizations. 🤔

If the user share of Firefox falls too low websites will stop supporting it (which is already happening), we will have given google the internet. Everything that is not Firefox is based on Chrome.

…the article you linked me? The topic of this discussion?

It shouldn’t be controversial to anyone. The suggestions given there are pretty mild. Regardless, justice is not the absence of conflict. Sorry the article made you upset but that doesn’t make it wrong.

I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
“No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.

More info needed here. I don’t see OP “making a fuss” but putting down someone’s suggestion so bluntly is kind of rude.

The article is about social media.

The “precise and specific actions” called for in that article, specifically for the purpose of combating speech that encourages violence, like homophobia or white supremacy:

• Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

• Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

• Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

• Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.

What’s your problem here?

Are you talking about the ex-CEO who got BTFO for being homophobic? Because that was based and cool, actually.

If Democrats actually wanted to win every election from now until forever, this would do it for them. Imagine worrying how you’re going to feed your kids and then the mail arrives “BTW you’ve qualified for food stamps for the last 18 months, here they are” instant loyal voter.

But they won’t

If you like your feudal lord, you can keep them!

Likewise, the IRS already knows everything about me. If I qualify for, say, food stamps, just have the IRS send me the food stamps. Don’t make me jump through hoops when I’m already destitute, come on.

This would make tens of thousands of jobs redundant and make many social programs much more efficient.