And for all this bullshit biden have done, I will vote Trump, thx for argumrnts against bidon

distrohop be like:

yeah, typo ):

Not an issue if you use an OS that values your freedom of choice

edit: typo

thanks, kinda understand

can someone explain please?

what about Huskies?

this wiki article came out on 6th of march 2024 lmao. Not saying, this doesn’t exist irl, but it’s really funny to me 0;

gives an idea to create something like “stablelinux” where people share uptime and what practices they use to not get into trouble

Why would anyone use it?

From my personal experience it became worse in the past few years. Sometimes I couldn’t find something only to find it with one search request in google or yandex /:

For Russia it’s crucial to select servers. They ban “fast servers” so quickly. I had to rollback on previous version to be able to use them. However it’s not possible anymore.

I am using openvpn method on my desktop, 'cause couldn’t install protonvpn-client.

I am not sad, I was mad for sometime, but not anymore. Free services are free for a reason after all.

Her groups are not superior in anyway, she never said this. And again, please provide quotes

Please, provide a quote from the book with chapter and a page which propagates atomism in a fascist manner. Or at least explain the situation from the book

Damn, I was reading wrong, sry.

She doesn’t propagate atomism, it’s always about thinking. If you feel better without communicating, why should you? In case of fountainhead main heroes feel better when communicating with same-minded for example. So she writes about social aspects

All she was rooting for, do what you like, if it respects people right to live. There is no atomatization subtext in her works. If you can provide quotes with explanation, than we can discuss it

Where she states about atomozation? In her books her heroes communicate with each other, drinking and go lazy. They can’t communicate with people not their kind, 'cause they get real bored. I doubt you can talk and dance with people you are not interested in.

Yet again, they don’t put themselves above others, they mostly don’t judge at all. They state facts and that’s it, no hostility involved.

Well, you are getting paid for your work, by someone who managed to get the business going, all hard things aside.

Wait, so if a person pays government to buy land, pays architect, providing him a job, to make a project of a factory, pays construction company to build factory, pays other different factories to buy machines for his factory, hires workers and pays them to work and produce goods is being parasite? Did I get it right?

It’s clearly stated, that they were on the siding track by someone’s mistake. She asked them to drive slowly in case of something and if another one is green, than go back to main road.

She knows how trainroads work and how to solve problems. She found a problem and solved it. She asked them to drive cautiously, so I don’t see a problem here.

Is it wrong for you to drive on a red light, if it’s by mistake of someone? You would also cautiously drive through it, to get to your destination, aren’t you? Maybe you would take another route. We take into account, that you know by fact, that this red light is broken and you wouldn’t wait until it’s fixed in front of it.

For me it’s not wrong to break this rule in the context of the situation. They were caught by mistake and it made a problem of getting late. She understood the situation, thought it through and solved the problem. It wasn’t reckless, which is clearly stated by asking them to drive cautiously.