Same as it was on reddit, but slightly more self-righteous about it.
Same as it was on reddit, but slightly more self-righteous about it.
That’s odd, considering the immigration was before the crisis by about a month and a half.
Ohhhh, Namor and Submariner.
Tell that to all the super users.
Submariner and Namor?
So the immigration event was a precurser to the Cuban missile crisis?
People who drink moderate amounts of wine regularly tend to have higher income, and thus better health in general. At least that’s the last generally accepting hypothesis I last saw.
So go from one shitty company to another?
Corrupt governments like capitalistic shitbags.
Yes, but those state and local elections have an effect both on how your state and local area does… as well as how those national elections are held. They are far more important than you give them credit for.
Don’t downplay them just because they don’t get national coverage, especially when they’re going to have significantly more impact on your daily life.
The president sure gets the credit for a lot of things (the president signed this into law, the president enacted this policy) but in reality Congress makes most of that a reality.
There is also accountability… but only if the congress acts on it. Which is where that whole “vote more than once every four years” thing comes in. Congress has power… we just have not elected people who use that power responsibly.
That’s probably at least a distance of five to six feet. And not even in front of him.
If you think you only get a choice once every four years, that’s part of the problem. There’s elections every single year, many of which you have more choice and more power over.
Maybe if people showed up to vote more than once every four years we’d actually see some effective change.
To a degree. It will adapt only so far. If you give it more than it can handle on a regular basis you’re doing more harm than good.
A 30 year old who took terrible care of themselves wrote this.
That’s what you take issue with? That the analogy isn’t completely perfect? Do you get the general idea of what I’m saying, or does that slight inconsistency complete negate the entire argument?
The point is that an average isn’t indicative of overall health… it’s just a value representing the average income. It makes no bearing on actual economic health without comparing it to other factors.
Which part? Can you explain your reasoning in a way that’s not just “nuh-uh”?
As I understand it, an average is when you add together several quantities and then divide that total by the number of quantities. How does this in any way affect actual living wage (or grades, in my given example)?
Just because something is average doesn’t mean it’s good.
If the average grade of a class is fifty… that doesn’t mean it’s a good grade. It just means a majority of the class is failing.
Finally my years of learning to play Tongo pay off!
Full Consortium 😎
Feel it, feel it.