While I agree with the point made, calling it a study makes it sound like it was done by an independent party. This study was conducted by the article publisher. Saying “a study by The Breach” or “Analysis by The Breach” would have been more accurate.
I just find it a bit ironic that a newspaper calling out the bias of an another newspaper don’t even take the time to label their title correctly…
Posted on South China Morning Post. Pretty obvious bias. If a Singaporean outlet would say the same thing, I would believe it, but I wouldn’t trust a Chinese journal (or an American).
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/south-china-morning-post/