I really like my Model 3 but I hate the association with Musk, I was considering buying it at the end of the lease but I’m having second thoughts. Yes, I know I’ve already lined his pockets in a small way!!

I haven’t experienced the poor build quality, in the 2.5 years I’ve had it I’ve not had any issues and only 1 recall for an o-ring replacement on a gas strut.

Tesla needs to be rescued from Musk by one of the established car manufacturers, my vote would be for Mercedes.

Isn’t this the plot of The Beekeeper? 😂

I was going to say he looks like a fatter, older Putin!!

Hi, I’m sure they are NVME. I think they are Seagate units. I didn’t use brand new ones, they were recycled from old workstations. I just reformatted them and installed them. Sorry I couldn’t be more help 😕

I’m in the UK and my experience is that DPD are one of the better ones, never had any real problems with their deliveries and updates by email and app are great.

But I suppose, we have Yodel and Evri as alternatives and they are proper terrible so the bar isn’t very high!!

I believe it is. What stands out to me is £1.04+ vat is not £1.45!!!

Out of curiosity, why have you decided to run each service in a separate lxc rather than just one lxc?

I am about to completely overhaul my set up and I’m not sure which way is best.

Hi,

The clone has a different IP address

Hi, thanks for your reply.

when I run mount -a -vvv I get the following:

mount.nfs: timeout set for Tue Aug 8 16:14:10 2023

mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=4.2,addr=192.168.0.188,clientaddr=192.168.0.116' mount.nfs: mount(2): Permission denied

mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=4,minorversion=1,addr=192.168.0.188,clientaddr=192.168.0.116'

mount.nfs: mount(2): Permission denied

mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'vers=4,addr=192.168.0.188,clientaddr=192.168.0.116'

mount.nfs: mount(2): Permission denied

mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'addr=192.168.0.188'

mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6

mount.nfs: trying 192.168.0.188 prog 100003 vers 3 prot TCP port 2049

mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=3, prot=17

mount.nfs: trying 192.168.0.188 prog 100005 vers 3 prot UDP port 661

mount.nfs: mount(2): Permission denied

mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting 192.168.0.188:/mnt/store/test-share

Hi, thanks for your reply.

Lets call the original Proxmox container CT1 and this has the *arrs Dockers that can access and interact with the NFS share on TrueNAS

Lets call the new Proxmox container CT2 and this is the one giving me the can’t access error

Lets call the cloned Proxmox container CT1Clone, this one can access the NFS share.

I think the NFS share is not restricted to any IP address, this is a screenshot of the NFS permissions. https://i.imgur.com/9k5jnw4.png I can also access if from my Windows machine that also has a different IP address.

CT1 & CT1Clone work fine, CT2 doesn’t work.

Thank you, I’m really pleased how it came out.

I’ve got 2 3D printers and I use them infrequently but they are really handy.

I don’t subscribe to Audible. 😳

I consume most of my books via audiobooks.

I’m just about to finish the final Expeditionary Force book, overall I really enjoyed the series, yes there were a few low points (we won’t talk about the the audio drama one!) but I thought it held up well.

This is my list of upcoming books:

My Raspberry Pi’s are named after planets and large bodies on the Solar system.

My servers are named after The Expanse characters and ships.

VM’s and CT’s after their usage with a tag in Proxmox for the OS used.

It depends on how busy the roundabout is.

If it’s really busy and there is a possibility of traffic backing up on either of the the two exits before the one you want to take then I’d be in the righthand lane on approach and move to the lefthand lane as soon as I’m past the second exit, getting in the lane marked A610 going under the bridge. This way you avoid possibly getting caught in slow moving traffic and adding to the back up.

If the roundabout isn’t that busy then using the lefthand lane on approach would be fine and just staying in the lefthand lane all the way.

Roundabouts need to be as free flowing as possible, so use whichever lane is going to keep the traffic moving best.

I use a roundabout everyday that crosses a motorway and the traffic joining the motorway always backs up the slip road on to the roundabout at rush hour. Often people wanting to go “straight” over the roundabout get in the lefthand lane on approach and then get stuck in the backed up traffic which just adds to the congestion. I tend to approach in the righthand lane and move to the left once past the motorway exit. I’ve noticed that people tend to leave a gap for the traffic in the righthand lane to go through but will block the lefthand lane just in case someone sneaks in front of them!! LOL

I’m swapping between the PWA of lemmy.world and wefwef.

I like the clean, simple interface that wefwef provides but I don’t like the iPhone inspired UI, sorry!

I also check out the beehaw PWA to see what being posted there.

Waiting on Sync for Lemmy though.

Saddest uninstall ever!! 😪