Sure buddy.

I’m glad you found a way to disengage without having to think about it. Must be a pretty fragile ego you have there if you go to such hilarious lengths to protect it.

…You realize it’s all there, right?

ETA: for everyone to see?

Let’s sum up:

You can’t understand a simple sentence explaining that you accept that there are common-sense limitations on the principles of liberal democracy (like freedom of speech), but you don’t accept that there are also common-sense limitations on the principles of anarchy (like freedom of association).

Then you tell me that I’m in denial about… something? It isn’t clear, really.

Then you tell me that I’m stupid for editing a spelling mistake.

What a hero to dig in your heels and die on the dumbest possible straw-man hill. I have so much to learn from you. I’ve changed my mind, thank you for correcting me with your angsty-teenager understanding of anarchism. o7

Oh, I see.

You think correcting yourself when you make a mistake is stupid.

That makes a whole lot of sense, actually.

ETA: TTYL! I can make you look foolish all day, baby! You give me such good material LMAO!

You’re inviting me to live in denial with you as your guest?

That’s very sweet, but I prefer reality.

Westerns can either be amazing or terrible.

Not much in between IMO.

I guess I walked right into that one?

Though telling me you don’t understand isn’t the brag you apparently think it is.

Same energy

ETA: It’s really funny that you’re making this argument in a thread you about how people don’t understand how the first amendment has limits, much like the principles of many types of anarchism have limits.

10/10, no notes.

Remember when they banned the word “fascist?”

Self-awarenes doesn’t seem to be their strength.

I’m going to assume you’re joking so I don’t go outside and scream into the middle distance.

I feel like you should every now and then…

Of course.

That’s what makes it even worse though: the joke is that Rudy isn’t really “molestable”, but the old freak goes for it anyway.

And the pièce de résistance is, of course, that he was found to have sexually assaulted at least one woman in a department store.

Yup. Perfectly normal to joke about molesting a woman in a department store.

“What are you, a father or a son?! You act like whichever is convenient for you at the time, you big phony!!”

That’s what you sound like right now. It’s pretty weird that you can’t understand mixed-race people; it’s quite simple.

According to Hill, Clarence Thomas asked her out socially many times during her two years of employment as his assistant, and after she declined his requests, he used work situations to discuss sexual subjects and push advances. “He spoke about… such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,” she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described “his own sexual prowess” and the details of his anatomy. Hill also recounted an instance in which Thomas examined a can of Coke on his desk and asked, “Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?”

Right?

That’s like asking the fuckin’ cops for shrooms.

Even Murphy’s law has exceptions!

I have yet to find anything at all better about “new” Outlook.

My favorite part is how they removed useful functions that worked perfectly well on the old version.

It’s broken, now it on goes forward at a pace of 1 day/day like a regular machine.