data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103ee/103eeb955d2761c74387fd389fe4714900d751d2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0df29/0df299352154612187bc0302983fbb96dfeadae9" alt=""
There are companies doing “cool-sounding” things with AI like Waymo. “Good” would require more definition.
There are companies doing “cool-sounding” things with AI like Waymo. “Good” would require more definition.
https://www.wheresyoured.at/deep-impact/ And the companion piece on his blog.
What I didn’t wager was that, potentially, nobody was trying. My mistake was — if you can believe this — being too generous to the AI companies, assuming that they didn’t pursue efficiency because they couldn’t, and not because they couldn’t be bothered.
This isn’t about China — it’s so much fucking easier if we let it be about China — it’s about how the American tech industry is incurious, lazy, entitled, directionless and irresponsible. OpenAi and Anthropic are the antithesis of Silicon Valley. They are incumbents, public companies wearing startup suits, unwilling to take on real challenges, more focused on optics and marketing than they are on solving problems, even the problems that they themselves created with their large language models.
My big robot is really expensive to build.
If big robot parts become cheaper, I will declare that the big robot must be bigger, lest somebody poorer than me also build a big robot.
My robot must be made or else I won’t be able to show off the biggest, most expensive big robot.
QED, I deserve more money to build the big robot.
P.S. And for the naysayers, just remember that that robot will be so big that your critiques won’t apply to it, as it is too big.