![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://spgrn.com/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Wait… a bill from Florida that isn’t malicious? Someone pinch me.
Wait… a bill from Florida that isn’t malicious? Someone pinch me.
I don’t think they meant the individuals are always selfish, more that the whole culture (and thus the lack of public transport) exists because of selfishness and fear.
Also in countries which are not as reliant on cars most people still have access to a car, they just use it less often.
‘it’s not perfect so we can’t’ is absolutely not the ‘dumbest fucking’ argument if we are talking about actual human lives.
How low of a human being must you be to claim evidence has been destroyed when it hasn’t. The cop who told that under oath should be fired and put in jail, like anyone else would.
I agree it’s a stupid company, but I don’t see why we should work against them if they finally decide to so something kinda good.
We build this entire reddit alternative without interconnectivity with reddit, why couldn’t we do that again if threads decides to do that. People will be familiar with how lemmy works and there will be no ads here, so I don’t completely see a problem. Plus the format of lemmy is completely different from threads right?
0.19 allows for instance blocking, so the good tools will be available.
How would they control it? If they do anything bad we can just defederate, right?
Is threads that bad?
My phone is to expensive to have expendable storage.
I heard they are also working on hiding their soldiers on the ground.
I know a way that works at least 1 in 7 times.
Chivalry 2 can also be played on deck, there are tutorials on how to do it.
My mom says I’m very brave, so that means I make it to step 8 at least right?
Obviously because you don’t post. We’re all waiting u know.
The ruling is a victory for Republican lawmakers and coal-related interests that argued that the carbon-pricing plan amounted to a tax, and therefore would have required legislative approval. Wolf, a Democrat, had sought to get around legislative opposition by unconstitutionally imposing the requirement through a regulation, they said.
Seems like they where trying to go around the opposition (with a majority). So couldn’t they just try this again if they do have a majority?
It can do actual people now? I thought it wouldn’t allow real actors and stuff.
Oh shit, I misread. Thought it banned social media from implementing addicting algorithms. Whoopsie