![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://spgrn.com/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffry.gs%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fc6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
To be fair, what they want is to make money off of you, be it through metadata or through advertising. It’s just that sending you videos happens to be the model which they use to get the metadata or advertising income.
To be fair, what they want is to make money off of you, be it through metadata or through advertising. It’s just that sending you videos happens to be the model which they use to get the metadata or advertising income.
Your metadata is still extremely valuable to them, and it’s not limited to just watch history and likes, but rather everything on how you engage in their services, including where your mouse cursor sits.
And Musk has already initiated a lawsuit against those who have shone a light on it.
Not using it helps do that.
Fair. My point was more that there are some breeds where it’s not just “more likely” to have poor health.
I’ve seen more than one hour long ad. It let you skip after 5 seconds, but imagine if someone were leaving it on as background.
Just like every other conservative social network *cough* Truth Social *cough*.
It’s a variation of a cold boot attack. Instead of forcing an OS crash and rebooting into an OS connected to a portable drive, you cool the memory to extend the time you have before the data degrades and can then do whatever you want with it. I believe you can extend it up to a week.
Harder, yes, but still good to note not impossible. There’s some cryogenic techniques that allow them to preserve what’s on the RAM long enough to read it.
Ed… Ward…
So pump n dump has more than one meaning here.
Under international law, you do not wantonly strike vehicles with markings for medical aid, such as ambulances. Doing so is a war crime. It doesn’t matter if it was, “an internationally recognized convoy.” It doesn’t matter if you suspect that it is fake.
Israel is admitting to violating Article 21 of the Geneva convention.
And yet, they are the ones accusing Amazon of price fixing.
Like I said, go tell them that they got it wrong.
Go ahead and tell the FTC that you know the law better than they do.
Yes, which is the price-fixing I was talking about. There doesn’t need to be an overt agreement to fall under price fixing.
Which is exactly what was described in the article.
Price fixing, whether explicit or implied from conduct, is absolutely something anti-trust regulations were designed to prevent.
I think it’s less to do with the fact that ads exist, and more to do with how intrusive they are. Early YouTube ads were pretty tame compared to the ones today, especially when it was just banner ads.
I wonder how that’s going to play out with Apple and their monopoly.