![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://spgrn.com/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.ml%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F8e1d8cc7-0593-466a-a904-de3b22bd4705.jpeg)
Evil if true
Evil if true
And they say lightning doesn’t strike the same place twice. Wow! 😮😮😮
Vlemmy refugees flocking in?
Looks good in principle! I’ve yet to try using it with anybody.
I wouldn’t say I have anything against capitalism in principle. I just like open and federated systems.
I think the main problem is that guys don’t understand what makes an attractive guy attractive. At least I don’t.
Thank you! Question about the in-app browser. Many other apps use it and I’ve always been wondering: does it save cookies and sessions or is it just a minimal thing that just opens the page temporarily with safari, without persitent storage?
It’d be great to support identity based on a key hash, so that it’s completely decoupled from any instances. Maybe some time in the future.
I think one should remember the happy moments to know what’s possible. If you’ve been there before, the place exists and you can get there again.
Somebody’s been crying in the shower…
Honestly, Lemmy as it is now already is way more fun and engaging than Reddit ever was for me. On Reddit, I’m mainly a lurker. Here, I want to participate.
Your tone and your assumption that everyone else is an idiot is irritating.
The key part of your first sentence is “via Proton”. Support for client side gpg is easy and they’re not doing it either out of some strategic play or purely out of stubbornness. Working on standarts is great! I’ve had a “Visionary” subscription to Proton for years, since before the VPN and all the extra stuff. I like the company, overall. But, as mentioned in my first comment, this is the singular most annoying part of their service to me.
Internally, yes. So, they only allow it if it’s under their control. This wouldn’t be a customer servie nightmare because only people who know how to use it would use it. Plus, their version of PGP doesn’t encrypt the subject.
Sounds more like an attempt to kill off gpg to win the market.
It’s a simple ask, not bending over backwards. I bet they haven’t touched the email encryption part of code in years, so it doesn’t add any maintenance burden either. I’ve looked at what they do - the only thing they’d need to change is their handling of email headers!
Yes, what’s the problem with that? Services should provide as much flexibility as possible.
One less email to have? Wdym???
Looks like my first time hearing about those is from them being removed