Was there even a mass exodus? I largely avoid Reddit now, but I do kind of doubt that they’ve been hurt in any meaningful way by all the protests and people leaving…

    • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      196
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Migration goes beyond sheer numbers. The 3.8k users are probably the one that were the most attached to initial Reddit, hence people who would contribute the more. I would rather be with those 3.8k users than the millions of people okay with staying on Reddit despite Spez’s decisions.

      I hope that once Lemmy is a bit more polished (instance blocking, account migration, hot filtering working etc.), we will gradually see a second wave of arrivals.

        • abraham_linksys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          1 year ago

          But if that were the case, wouldn’t GDPR already be used to take down TOR or torrents or any other p2p tech? All it would take is someone’s personal information being on them, right? (I’m really asking I have no idea)

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Then you adapt to that threat with user exports or built in auto migration methods.

              The distributed nature makes it much harder to down the fediverse with legal claims than it does reddit/twitter/whatever already. Just being hosted in different countries makes these claims a stunning pain in the ass, as many countries do not require any compliance with the DMCA.

              • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure if you want to play in a sandbox alone and have nothing but privacy and lqbgt content (nothing against them in the least bit).

          • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a good point. Right now if I send something out, even if the company I submitted it to deletes it from their servers, doesn’t mean other users will delete copies of the data I want to have deleted. Only the party I submitted it to will have to delete it.

            Just take a screenshot of a tweet or a LinkedIn profile or whatever someone posts here in the Fediverse, anyone can capture a copy of it.

        • grte@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s currently impossible to follow a GDPR information delete request for example, because you can’t delete the info from other instances.

          What makes it impossible? Why would any given instance maintainer be responsible for the data on someone else’s instance? Would it not fall on the GDPR requester to make that request of each individual instance?

            • grte@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              43
              ·
              1 year ago

              So then if someone requests that Gmail delete all their email data, is Google then responsible for making sure any emails sent out from it’s server to another is also deleted from those external servers?

              • Fapper_McFapper@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                40
                ·
                1 year ago

                Just in case you guys are wondering, there’s probably dozens of us enjoying the fuck out of this conversation. Thank you for asking questions I wouldn’t think of asking. On behalf of all three of us lurking.

              • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t have the answer but I think of it like this.

                Email is essentially a direct conversation between you and someone in the same room but you may extend (cc) to those people in the house. There is an implicit “I am including you in the conversation”

                Lemmy on the other hand is more akin to talking to someone in a crowded bar but the conversation is recorded and anyone over the world has the ability to listen to the conversation at any given time.

                Apples and oranges.

                • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Interesting perspective, but then cannot we consider that Lemmy users are aware that they are including all of the Fediverse in their conversation? That way Lemmy instances could be treated in the same way email providers are

              • ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Essentially yes, it’s called the Right to Erasure or the Right to be Forgotten. If the user is in a country that adheres to GDPR and the company controlling the data operates in a country that also uses GDPR, then that right applies.

                The only reason Google/Gmail wouldnt delete (or wouldn’t be able to delete) some of your data would be if they had a lawful or legitimate basis for holding onto it.

                I can’t think of a reason Google would give for hanging on to your data but that doesn’t mean there isn’t one, but they’d have to notify you of that reason as part of their response to your request.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unless these instances are showing ads and selling data, I’m pretty sure they’re protected from the law. Not only that but if you’re not hosting in the EU that law doesn’t apply to you.

                • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The problem here is how does that work? If I host something in the USA, how is someone going to bring a lawsuit towards me if I am also in the USA?

                  Asking honest questions here. As this just sounds like a lot of chest thumping from the EU.

                  “Provided your company doesn’t specifically target its services at individuals in the EU, it is not subject to the rules of the GDPR.”

                  Just say, we don’t provide or target EU individuals and you’re free.

                  • King@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Just say, we don’t provide or target EU individuals and you’re free.

                    Don’t allow users from the EU to sign up? Is that your plan?

                • Action Bastard@lemmy.world@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, but if you don’t have any assets in the EU for them to seize, and if you’re not present in the bloc yourself it doesn’t matter for shit. They have no jurisdiction or ability to enforce unless you really, really want to operate inside of their market at scale.

            • Azzu@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, but “the controller” is one instance, and it’s certainly easy for one instance to allow a user to be forgotten. You can purge the user from the instance. Then they are forgotten, as far as the instance is concerned.

              As an example, just because someone makes a GDPR request on YouTube to delete a video, does not require Google to actually remove the video from the whole internet. There are plenty of websites that archive content which are unaffected by that GDPR request. It’s the exact same thing with different Lemmy instances, just because you ask lemm.ee to delete your content does not mean that lemmy.world needs to delete your content.

              • King@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The GPDR doesn’t require Lemmy to remove personal data from the entire internet. But when a Lemmy instance gives data to other Lemmy instance, there are legal responsibilities.

                https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/ Where the controller has made the personal data public and is obliged pursuant to paragraph 1 to erase the personal data, the controller, taking account of available technology and the cost of implementation, shall take reasonable steps, including technical measures, to inform controllers which are processing the personal data that the data subject has requested the erasure by such controllers of any links to, or copy or replication of, those personal data.

                ==========

                Maybe this is open to interpretation, but I feel that the same Federation protocol that federates out my personal data (my posts and comments), should also federate out my delete requests. I’m unsure why this would be controversial.

        • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is a big issue of eu regulations. They are needed, but don’t account for non profit initiatives, in practice favoring big players

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m never to sure about GDPR. The spirit of the law is that any identifiable information has to indeed be removed.

          However, does a Lemmy username really fit that definition? If John Doe has all of his Lemmy content under CoolNick89, I’m not sure GDPR applies.

          Emails, especially if they contain first and last name, are a different story, but those would only be known by the host instance.

            • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Interesting, thanks. I’ll research this further.

              IP addresses make more sense, because they can be used to be cross-checked with your ISP to know who you are.

              If you don’t tell anyone your username and use a VPN, there is no way for people to guess your Lemmy username

          • King@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The law specifically names “online identifier”.

            The data subjects are identifiable if they can be directly or indirectly identified, especially by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or one of several special characteristics, which expresses the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, commercial, cultural or social identity of these natural persons. In practice, these also include all data which are or can be assigned to a person in any kind of way. For example, the telephone, credit card or personnel number of a person, account data, number plate, appearance, customer number or address are all personal data.

            https://gdpr-info.eu/issues/personal-data/

            • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thanks for the definition, and that brings us to the next question: I know your identifier, King@lemm.ee. However, does that make you identifiable by me, even indirectly? I have no way to identify you using that information.

              I always think that they meant online identifier such as jdoe@company.com, where the identifier indeed directly allows to identify the person.

              • King@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The CCPA (USA version) and GDPR (EU) both specify Personal Data, not Personally Identifiable Information. So the contents of my posts are my personal data, even if my username doesn’t identify to a real person. If I want my personal data removed from Lemmy, the GDPR allows for me to request it to be deleted.

                Lemmy is still in the early stages. I’m not asking for changes to be made right away, or even this year. But I do feel that my personal data should be under my control. Lemmy should be programmed to federate out the the deletion of all my personal data, if I make such a request.

                Where the controller has made the personal data public and is obliged pursuant to paragraph 1 to erase the personal data, the controller, taking account of available technology and the cost of implementation, shall take reasonable steps, including technical measures, to inform controllers which are processing the personal data that the data subject has requested the erasure by such controllers of any links to, or copy or replication of, those personal data

                (*) Note the CCPA has a ton of exceptions, and only really applies to the larger social media sites.

        • Well, the upside and the downside of GDPR is that if you’re not a member of the EU, you can basically just tell them to go fuck themselves because they have little to no actual power to impact you since you’re not within their jurisdiction.

        • timespace@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Makes me wonder if the fediverse shouldn’t be individually instanced. Like Each persons phone/browser is their own individual “instance”. Maybe a central hub/series of hubs (like instances as they are now maybe) that act like dns servers to point everyone around. No content is hosted on them, they just tell everyone’s apps where to look to the other apps for posts.

          I have no idea, I’m a moron and I don’t know how the internet actually works. I’m guessing this is a problem at scale.

          • LUHG@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re not a moron, you were slightly right with dns. You’re idea is actually quite sound and it’s something I’m interested in also. Basically p2p social networking.

            We used to be able to stream 1080p via torrent stream p2p. We could do it.

      • Dookie_howser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or those 3.8k users were on Apollo, RIF etc that didn’t bring any revenue to Reddit regardless.

        They could care less about these users leaving, there are plenty of new angsty teenagers to take their place

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they’re the same that generated significantly more content, then it’s still a loss for reddit

          It doesn’t really matter, though. The fact that I’m here and not using reddit has netted a huge improvement in my happiness.

          To be honest, I don’t really care if more reddit users come here. They can keep their bad takes and dick-swinging contests on reddit.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          A very good point. To be honest, if they are happy with that new demographic, and we are happy here, everyone’s happy

      • King@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately, as one of those 3.8k daily users, I’m still using Reddit mostly. Lemmy has a long way to go before I drop Reddit all the way.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fine, really. There is no rush, the only people setting deadlines here were Reddit, and they still have to actually do something about killing access to 3rd parties (I know a lot of people still use 3rd party apps with Revanced keys)

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The next wave won’t come until Lemmy post are indexed by google and ranking up on the first page. Until then, searching for obscure things will still land on old Reddit posts.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depending on the domain, Reddit content might get outdated quite fast (definitely true for tech content).

          Even creative fields such as fantheories and such will probably emerge on Lemmy once new shows are released (Futurama could be a good example).

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the problem is, Lemmy’s greatest strength (Fediverse) is also the thing that’s going to hold back a mass migration at this point in time. Onboarding with Reddit is a breeze. You make an account, it asks you what your interests are and location based communities and you’re off to the races. Every community on reddit is immediately available to interact with.

      When I came to lemmy I almost gave up on my initial onboarding and I’m a pretty tech savvy guy. I didn’t know where to go to start. There’s all these different lemmy sites and I didn’t know if they were the same thing or different and if I was signing up to the right one. Account creation failed initially without giving an error message (I’ll chalk that one up to just a bug). There didn’t seem to be any NSFW communities until I figured out the instance thing. You’re told you can use your account across instances but when you go to another instance via it’s domain you can’t interact with it, you have to get to another instance through your instance which is confusing as a newcomer. Any one of these issues is a falling off point for a less inclined visitor.

      I’m not saying the fediverse thing is bad but the unfortunate byproduct of it is a difficult experience for newcomers, especially when you compare it to Reddit. I’m hoping growth in the community will bring in talent to solve for this initial experience or possibly apps which can handle all of this more seamlessly.

      • astral_avocado@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I wonder if federated instances are something that can just become cultural knowledge over time, like any other technical piece of software. To a degree using reddit is like that to newcomers with it’s unique thread style and “independently” moderated subs. Lemmy just took it to another level.

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Very good point. It will be generational maybe too. As younger people enter the Lemmy pool, they may not find it to be that unfriendly since it will be what they are used to.

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You joined almost a month back, those were rough times. Today is much better.

        Today I would just tell people

        1. Go to lemmy.world (even old.lemmy.world if they like that interface)
        2. Lurk for a while
        3. When you want to create an account, do it in LW. You will be able to move it later on.

        That’s pretty much it.

        • LUHG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. Back then federation wasn’t working either, apps were miles behind and servers were slow.

      • Unseeliefae@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had pretty much the same experience migrating from Reddit to Lemmy and I still don’t entirely understand how this thing works.

        I’m still trying to figure out if I need to make an account on each Lemmy instance to reserve my username, since this is already my second account after fmhy.ml stopped working.

    • omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish some of the subs I frequented the most were a bit more active here, but I guess it’s a bit chicken and egg. Need to interact more with Lemmy ourselves to motivate others to.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t matter if there is or isn’t a mass mitigation, the %1 who did the modding and content creation were the loudest about the changes and most have started to move to other platforms. It’s very obvious now on reddit that the quality of the posts have started to tank.

    • DrQuint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mind you that an active user is “anyone who makes a post”, and not readers nor subscribers, which are the metrics reddit uses.

      With that said, yeah, no, there was no migration.