• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    So you’re telling me I get free accommodation, free food, and it’s protected by a T-rex?

    • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Humana last weeks without food, you think you’re going to starvea 7 ton, cold blooded carrion eater to death in a mere month?

      • Khrux@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        7 ton seems pretty big and I think they were warm-blooded, I recon they’ll start starving before I run out of food. They may not be dead by day 30 but on those final nights of starving unconciousness you could probably stick it with the knife. Large birds of prey may only eat once per day but they still starve within a couple of days, and the bigger they are, the hungrier they get.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Alligators and crocodiles can go months without eating. If needed, apparently, even 2 years. I wouldn’t count on a dinosaur being weak with hunger in a few weeks.

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Will the T-Rex be provided food? Because I could just wait it out. But if it’s provided food I’d just make sure it swallows the hunting knife with its meal and in theory it should cause some gastrointestinal leakage…

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It probably sucks down sharp bones no problem. But then, nobody really has any idea. It could play the ukulele for all we know.

  • soulless@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Rub the blade into fecal matter, wait till she nods off and then stab deeply before quickly returning to the hut. Repeat a few times.

    Now just wait for the sepsis to kick in and collect the prize.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I get a roof over my head and food… For free!?

    The T-rex will probably die eventually from starvation… Which means I could lose my roof and free food. Biggest challenge will be trying to keep the T-rex alive…

      • Nepenthe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Alternative option: No one said how much or what type of food, and T-Rex are thought to have been scavengers. Spend a month splitting your meal. Tame it. Make friends with it. Teach it to love. Then kill it.

        @Tattorack

  • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I know it’s green text but come on. Even T-Rex sleep. Wait for that, poke its eyes out, cut its tendons and then just go death by a thousand cuts on that big lizard.

    • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I imagine you’d walk up to an eyelid that’s thicker than your arm, luckily still wedge the knife between the eye, get absolutely deafened as it screams out in pain, and either trampled or catapulted as it flails about, or just plain nommed on as it sees you with the remaining good eye.

      How exactly did you plan on getting over to the other eye before getting crunched, anyways? They’re not exactly tiny heads.

  • ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I don’t think he would last long with our current oxygen levels, there is a reason why such giant creatures don’t exist anymore.

    On top of that like comments said if we just waited out he would starve to dead, even if we were not provided food.

    *Edit

    Well looks like I was wrong, thx for clarifying that out.

    Really though the reason for big animals not being as prevelant anymore was really the oxygen levels Idk where I got that from.

    But then it is really weird how the evolution meta didn’t evolve back to the huge beasts we see on books, someone said in the comments that it was due to the mammals success, if so it puts things really into perspective.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is easy.

    As long as I’m getting food and the T-Rex isn’t, just sit in the hut and wait.
    T-Rex will pass out of hunger and thirst. Once it stops moving I wait a day or two then finish the job with the knife.

    • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’ll defer to actual paleontologists (or anyone who drops links), but my guess is T-Rex could go a month without food easy. Most modern large reptiles typically go a long time between meals.


      Edit: following the intense scholarship in this thread, I have changed my stance. T-Rex probably would not survive a month without food (or water). BUT ALSO, the entity setting the rules and betting 500 mil on it surviving is going to know that. So the Dino’s getting fed either way.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Dinosaurs were not reptiles. Reptiles already existed when dinosaurs evolved and there are completely different evolutionary lineage.

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          That is not even a little true. If it was your phylogeny would mean crocodillians aren’t reptiles.

            • Communist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              It is your phylogeny (not philosophy), you’re proposing a different phylogeny than science does.

              Archosaurs, such as crocodillians, diverged from a common ancestor BEFORE birds/dinosaurs did, from other reptiles.

              In order for what you’re saying to be true, we’d have to exclude crocodillians from being reptiles. No standard definition would not include crocodillians as reptiles. In modern taxonomy, we use what are called monophyletic groups to determine relatedness. Because of this, birds and all dinosaurs fall under the clade archosauria, and are therefore reptiles.

              In essence, what you’re proposing would be like saying “Your cousin is a reptile, but not your brother”