• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hoskins and Leguizamo were apparently drunk from start to finish.

    I watched it a few years ago, and it’s bad, but nowhere near as bad as you’d think.

    • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      There’s an interesting fan edit on the web with a bunch of deleted scenes added. I guess Disney came in at the last minute ( like literally a few days before shooting) and butchered the script to make it more kid friendly. The actors and director were understandably pissed and pushed back but Disney always wins. They ended up with all these gritty looking sets and a kind of goofy dialog that just didn’t match.

      It’s a bummer because it seems like there were some really cool ideas in the original story.

  • Ænima@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Interesting enough, the old Super Mario movie was the premise of the Some More News movie. It’s a little out there and references past episodes of SMN, but when they start landing the references and comparisons, it blows your mind!

  • DannyMac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    To be honest, I love both films. Bob Hoskins was the perfect personification of Mario, IMHO. John Leguizamo, not so much, but I still enjoyed his portrayal of Luigi.

  • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The old one makes Mario’s love interest a plus size black woman. The new one doesn’t have any nonwhite characters except for extras and fantasy creatures.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Mario Brothers are supposed to be Italian American.

      Peach has already been established as blonde and white.

      Who else is a main character that you wanted to be non-white? All the other main characters, from what I remember, are animal-like creatures.

      • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The 90s movie worked on the same source material as the 20s movie, in a more conservative environment, and still managed better representation in terms of onscreen characters. Deciding not to have any racially diverse characters because everyone’s a raceless cartoon is a choice the writers made, and they could have chosen differently.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Why are you ignoring the 30+ years of character design and refinement that went on in the Mario universe between the two films?

          Shouldn’t your beef be with Nintendo, anyways?

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The Mario Brothers are supposed to be Italian American

        What are you even trying to say? Historically yes Italian Americans faced racism, descrimination and a strong lack of representation but that really hasn’t been a problem for most Italian americans about a hundred years

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m saying the race of those characters has been well established beyond just a “colour scheme” or arbitrary choice

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I turned off the new one when they got to the Rainbow Road, can’t say I enjoyed it up to that part but that’s when I felt it was an advertisement not a story

    • shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      everything that people say is a word, and if it’s said enough it ends up in the dictionary. unless you’re editing a professional paper for grammar and spelling there’s no point to be made here. everything people say is a word. you understood what they meant, didn’t you?

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess the years of learning grammar and being tested on it were waste, then. As long as I can barely glean intent, then its fine.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          As long as I can barely glean intent, then its fine.

          This sounds like reductio ad absurdum from a monoglot. Try living in a culture where you need a foreign language and you’ll begin to see the levels of nuance in understanding speech.