Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a ‘noble’ end?

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It works out just fine if you don’t think self-preservation is the most important aspect of life. Buddhist moral development demands realizing the temporary nature of life. A massacre is just another means by which one’s life ends. A person is still responsible for upholding moral principles.

    • BitSound@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I realize we’re probably not going to convince each other over some internet comments, but that’s not a philosophy I’d sign up for. Morality is subjective, and I’d rather choose moral principles that don’t involve me accepting being massacred.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A massacre, or a genocide, is more than just “one’s” life ending. It is one’s own life, the lives of one’s loved ones, and the lives of one’s people.