• StrayCatFrump@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you’re just like, quadrupling down or so on the fact that you have no idea what private property is now. And want to project onto other people confident incorrectness.

    Clearly there’s no point continuing this with an ignorant liberal troll. GFYS.

    • ssboomman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If someone owns land with the intent of exploiting labor for profit that land is private property.

      If they buy a gun to keep people off that property and personally patrol it to ensure that’s property’s safely they are protecting private property.

      If they do it without the use of a government or a governing agency they are protecting private property without a government.

      Therefore it is possible to protect private property without a government.

      If you can’t comprehend that, you’re a moron. You don’t need a central government to protect private property, you just need violence, albeit the correct form of violence. Next time do some reading and learn a few things before you try to correct someone.

      So like I said earlier, a dude with a gun can protect private property.