• unfreeradical@lemmy.worldEnglish
    22·
    10 months ago

    No. Sorry.

    Private property is not a concept that coherently describes the behaviors of rats.

    Private property is a social construct that occurs in some but not all human societies.

    Modern society, organized by the capitalist mode of production, produces the class disparity through private property.

    Socialists seek the abolition of private property, and thereby, the eradication of the class disparity.

      • unfreeradical@lemmy.worldEnglish
        13·
        10 months ago

        Sharing is a general description of a robust, essentially universal, human behavior.

        As a general tendency, it also appears within the behavior of many other species.

        You have been invoking unconventional terminology, and now have descended essentially into incoherence.

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.worldEnglish
          32·
          10 months ago

          If dictionary terminology is unconventional then yes, we have descended into incoherence.

            • LemmysMum@lemmy.worldEnglish
              32·
              10 months ago

              Your incapacity to follow a demonstrative metaphore is not an issue of my capacity.

                • LemmysMum@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  32·
                  10 months ago

                  You believe that because your understanding of my position is incomplete and you have chosen this as the point to switch from comprehension to belligerence.

                  • unfreeradical@lemmy.worldEnglish
                    13·
                    10 months ago

                    I feel the structure of my engagement was balanced and measured, as you moved from irregular terminology to outright hokem.

                    What do you wish to achieve, by asserting that private property is ineradicable and also observed in rats?

                    Who else shares such beliefs or perspective?