- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
EU staff criticise von der Leyen over Israel stance as per Euractiv
Aljazeera as a source? So you’d also link to “Der Stürmer” if it went back into publication?
Not quite the same are they.
Not quite, but it’s al-jazeera is still not even remotely acceptable as a source.
Mediabiasfactcheck has them as “mixed”, so they’re about 3.6 Roentgen, as in “not great, not terrible”.
They’re an unequivocally biased source. They still have articles up claiming 500 people were killed in the hospital explosion, and “many are disinclined to believe Israel’s claim.” They immediately repeated Hamas propaganda without any verification, and wrote a score of articles ginning up hate.
Al Jazeera used to be somewhat reliable, but it hasn’t been for years. They’re not hiding it either.
I mean, did anyone really expect a quatari media outlet to be actually free and unbiased? That’s like, being dismayed that russian media is parroting kremlin directives.
Generally speaking, sure. In this case however they’re utterly useless. As @JasSmith@sh.itjust.works explains below, they’re the ones who spread the hoax about an Israeli missile killing 500 people in a hospital in Gaza.
These people have blood on their hands.
Bro what
So… EU chief sides with an autocratic genocider, and the same EU is banning e2ee, which would enable surveillance on journalists.
I don’t think Al Jazeera is a fair source, yet those above are facts.
Sorry, EU, it’s too much for me now.
Fuck that Nazi bitch.
Even in germany nobody likes her, but she is no Nazi bitch - if you say this you don’t know what a Nazi is.
Cry me a river
Ignorance is bliss, I suppose.
Where’s my river?