• fosforus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can be pro-palestinian people and still think that after several decades of not being able to suppress the violent factions inside their nation, they should completely bail off from that general area.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        USA seemed to rather successfully suppress the violent factions inside their nation, several times.

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s probably the norm. Finland, the posterboy of peace, started its independence with a civil war and continued by joining the Nazis in WW2 against Soviet Union.

            Seems to me that there are two kinds of nations on this planet: dead ones and those that were at some point based on violence.

          • Kepabar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            All nations are built and maintained by violence, either directly or by threat of it.

            It’s a core component of sovereignty. To be able to call your government sovereign you must have the capacity to resist both external and internal actors from being able to overthrow you.

            You must also be willing and able to use violence against those under your rule who disobey your laws (i.e, arresting a murderer).