• frazorth@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It wouldn’t be because people owning multiple houses is not the issue. Going to have to paste my usual response from Reddit to people thinking that landlords and second houses are the problem.


    https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2022-0001/

    In total, the EHS estimates that English households owned 873,000 second homes, of which 495,000 were second homes located in the UK.

    https://citymonitor.ai/government/england-short-4-million-homes-here-s-how-we-can-build-them-3921

    And there are 27.8 million homes in the UK, and we are apparently short 4 million.

    So we ban second homes and that releases almost 450,000 houses which is less than 2% of the housing stock and we are still short 3.5 million houses, now what do we do?

    • Liquid_Fire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The EHS defines these as “homes that are primarily used as holiday homes (by family, friends or let to others as a holiday let) or are occupied while working away from home.”

      This clearly doesn’t include regular rental properties, so I don’t see how it shows landlords are not a problem.

    • buzziebee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well there are 4 million rental properties in the UK so your numbers don’t quite add up. A very significant number of properties are purchased and rented as investment assets. No one is saying that ending landlord property portfolios will magically fix the issue overnight, but it certainly adds inflationary pressure on house prices and prices normal people out from being able to purchase homes. Houses should be homes first, not speculative assets.

      Through taxation policy it should be possible for a family to move home and rent their old one, or rent an inherited one whilst waiting to sell, etc without much additional burden. But we shouldn’t encourage private entities pricing out normal people from homes and forcing entire generations to only be renters.

      The economic damage from high house prices and lack of generational wealth is way too expensive to allow this portion of the market to continue. Simultaneously we need to be building a fuckload more homes, yes, but there being other things to change shouldn’t dismiss other helpful ideas.