• alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    All these people already sell the stock of their own companies to diversify their holdings or to buy a yacht, island or Twitter.

    Selling stock on the market to pay the tax man is no different.

    They still keep a billion dollars worth of stock, so its not like they end up poor.

    And the government can “forcefully” take a third of a working mans income, which is way worse than taxing wealth. Go cry me a river.

    • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They don’t actually sell stock in a lot of cases, they keep it and take out loans against it. That can only go so far though, if you are like the rest of the crazy people here and suggest we just tax billionaires until they are no longer billionaires, then that won’t work.

      Why not take the income of these business owners? Just like we take the income of everyone else? Why special rules for taxing this specific group of people you don’t like?

      • alvvayson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they can take out loans to buys islands, Yachts and overpriced tweet companies, then let them take out loans to pay tax.

        They only have five figure incomes thanks to the loopholes, so that isn’t a fair level of taxation compared to their actual capital gains that they artificially keep as “unrealized” on paper. A trick unavailable to us mere mortals.

        You’re a tool.

        • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or, crazy thought, make it so they can’t take out loans against their stock; especially if it’s not for private use! Maybe that way, people like Musk will be forced to give themselves salaries that can be taxed by the government.

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s clear you don’t know how things work at all. You can’t expect to tax someone billions every year and not have to sell the thing causing such a huge tax burden. This isn’t an infinite money glitch, the loan thing can only go so far.

          Also, unrealized gains are a real thing, stocks go up and down, and the change in value is unrealized until it’s sold. If a stock goes up $100 that isn’t $100 in my pocket, because tomorrow it could go down $200. If you want to tax these unrealized gains, then you should be paying out the unrealized losses as well. You would also be screwing up the middle class retirement funds, so thanks for that.

          • alvvayson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You have a big mouth for someone who has zero clue.

            Obviously, taxes are levied on a yearly basis and not every day, so daily fluctuations in value are irrelevant.

            And retirement funds are tax exempt, so they will not be screwed.

            And yes, people who can’t afford to pay property taxes have to sell property. That is a reality we all have to deal with, so why not let the super rich also deal with it.

            Dude, get some education.

            • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you not proposing taxing billionaires billions in taxes until they are no longer billionaires? That’s what everyone else seems to be suggesting. If they took out billion dollar loans to pay this tax, their wealth would be the same or more every year and they would pay billions more next year. It doesn’t take long for there to be no more loans available because all the owned stock is held as collateral for these billions in tax loans they took out.

              Oh, thanks for singling out one form of stock ownership while harshly taxing another. Not all middle class “retirement” accounts are under that retirement umbrella though. Since there are a lot of restrictions in those many will have regular stock holdings that would be taxed under your plans.

              Financial and real assets are different. We don’t tax financial assets as property, and only some real property gets a property tax.

              You really don’t see how your ideas won’t work, do you?