produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square388fedilinkarrow-up12.13Karrow-down177
arrow-up12.05Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square388fedilink
minus-squareconst_void@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down8·1 year agoThe tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.
minus-squareherpington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoHow do you handle a CEO owning stock worth that amount in the marketplace, then?
minus-squareSmk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoThey don’t. No one can explain how a wealth tax work because it doesn’t work.
minus-squareherpington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoMy issue wasn’t with a wealth tax (even though I’m against it), but pulling some arbitrary wealth cap out of thin air opens a lot of questions that many people don’t consider the implications of.
The tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.
How do you handle a CEO owning stock worth that amount in the marketplace, then?
They don’t. No one can explain how a wealth tax work because it doesn’t work.
My issue wasn’t with a wealth tax (even though I’m against it), but pulling some arbitrary wealth cap out of thin air opens a lot of questions that many people don’t consider the implications of.
Removed by mod