• Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, not a single bit of this anecdote sounds like injustice. Business owner ignored the law (or was ignorant of it) and got sued by someone because that’s how the ADA works. The consequence is that the business owner was forced to bring their business into compliance with the law. In this case, they had to spend a trivial amount of money.

    This is exactly how the ADA is supposed to work. That was the plan all along. It’s intended consequences.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The plaintiff wanted money over a service they didn’t even require access to. That’s what makes it frivolous, especially when you see they specifically target small regional seed companies.