• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Taking survival of the fittest and using it as evidence of vaguely analogous principles for how human society works has a long history of being wrong. That the way we behave is biased towards survival and reproduction in our native habitat does not imply that the concept of self interest must be at the foundation of how our minds function.

    • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re trying to throw away milions of years of evolution that shaped us, because why exactly? Evolution is a well established scientific theory, what’s your counterargument?

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You may want to take a look at the book “The Dawn of Everything” by David Graeber and David Wengrow. It provides a compelling argument that past human societies were quite egalitarian, cooperative and non-authoritarian, and that the human civilizations of recorded history being the way they are is actually an aberration from the norm.

        Quick video summary of the book by one of the author’s here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SJi0sHrEI4

        • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You should look into “Selfish Gene” by Richard Dawkins. Cooperative strategies are perfectly viable for selfish reasons - don’t mistake cooperative efforts with altruism