• zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    She talks a good game now, let’s hope she sticks with that stance after the bill is introduced.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Signal is maintained by a nonprofit foundation in California. They don’t have shareholders or profits to worry about, unlike Apple, Google, Meta, and the rest.

      After all they’ve done to ensure their users’ privacy, I would be genuinely shocked if they capitulate to just this one country.

    • anon@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 days ago

      I don’t believe a bill will be introduced.

      The Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten) have decided to standardize the use of the encrypted messaging app Signal for non-classified communications via mobile phones.

      The Swedish military would likely have to reevaluate their use.

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Frankly the military should re-evaluate.

        As good as Signal is for the average non-technical person, organizations with resources would be far better served by hosting their own, using something like XMPP with encryption, with servers only permitting connection from their own compiled clients, run in a container on the phone, which have been available since at least 2010.

        No business I’ve worked for would accept Signal as a solution, in part because you have little control over it.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Wire (https://wire.com/) uses the same OTR / double-ratchet encryption primitives as Signal, but focuses more on self-hosting, and supporting organizations that want to self-host (for whatever reason).

          I believe GNU Jami, well-deployed is capable of Signal’s level of security while being self-hosted.

        • randombullet@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          I mean signal is used for non-secret non-sensitive communications.

          It’s like hey we have a formation here at this time.

          Hey we have inventories here.

          It’s good enough for basic stuff. No one will be using signal for anything higher than unclassified.

          Also phones are often not issued to soldiers so I doubt most are going to install a military related/developed app onto it.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Nato and some Swedish agencies already use Matrix, Försvarsmakten should help standardize.

      • nibby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        SAF is really not happy about this. Most people in the military used and recommend Signal for most communication (both personal and non-confidential) until they standardized it, and most people I have contacted facepalmed at the proposal. Hopefully, the dipshit that got this stupid fucking idea (pardon my french) will meet the same storm of critisim as Ylva Johansson got.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m surprised Sweden is going this route at all, considering they’ve touted being a privacy respecting country in the past. I suppose that gets enshitified at some point, too.