‘Baldur’s Gate 3’ can be a fantastic experience and a bad game at the same time.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with them that it isn’t an objective measure of quality, but who rates any form of art or entertainment by objective measures only? The whole point of them is to be subjective.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Gaming media has a difficult time differentiating their thoughts on games as a consumer product and games as art. For the former, it’s useful to have objective measures. For the latter, subjective.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But what is an objective measure for game quality? You’ll often see things used like total hours needed to complete it and things, but those are not measures of quality. Enjoyment per hour should be, but then it’s back to subjective. There isn’t an objective measure for a game being good. You can look at things like framerate and such, but it still doesn’t measure quality you can make your game very simplistic and get high FPS, and graphical quality is mostly subjective.

        Viewing games outside of their context as a product for entertainment, which is inharently subjective, is always flawed.

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those are in fact all objective measures of a game’s quality. FPS on certain hardware, game length, frequency of crashes, the presence of microstuttering, lists of features, these are all things that can be quantified, and by being quantified they are made objective. You can take this information and compare games against each other to make purchasing decisions, critique them, etc. Those decisions are subjective, yet they are based on objective data.

          But I didn’t say that we should only use objective measures to evaluate games, nor do I agree that we can only evaluate games subjectively. We need both, gaming media should give us both, but we both need to be able to distinguish between them.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, those are objective, but if we run a PS2 game in modern hardware it’ll have high FPS. What does that mean for quality?

            There are objective measured, but they’re useless without context that requires subjectivity. Do you like retro-asthetics? You may like the PS2 looking game with high FPS. If you don’t then you might not.

            Bugs existing I guess is a useful objective-ish measure. It depends on what happens, how often, and when though, not just the number of them or them existing.

            I agree we need media looking at both, but purely objective reporting should not be giving a game a rating on overall quality.

            (I’m nit arguing with you. I’m pretty much agreeing. I just wanted to clarify what I meant.)

      • CrateDane@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even as a consumer product it’s not really possible to boil it down to objective measures. Just like clothing follows tastes and fashions that are inherently subjective, or books, movies and TV shows etc.