• TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good question. Maybe the same reason why Elon “humour is now legal again” Musk can’t take a little teasing?

  • theinspectorst@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s not tracking Elon’s jet. The activity of Elon’s jet is already public information. All he’s doing is republishing it on a widely used platform.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The ridiculous thing about his claim of ‘doxxing’ and ‘assassination coordinates’ is yeah, it’s all public on the FAA website, and anyone who was trying to stalk him or whatever would just look there. The tracking Twitter account was basically just niche celebrity news.

    • Kaito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah unfortunately being on Threads doesn’t guarantee that the information would be public. I think this news is only relevant to the few who have joined Threads.

    • starlinguk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, not sure why the Guardian is reporting on this. I’m not even sure Threads is available in Britain.

  • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ve also been on Mastodon (@elonjet@mastodon.social) for about 8 months with 66k followers already

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The flap that Musk made about that led to one of the most ridiculously dumb phrases he has said yet: “assassination coordinates”.

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why competition in the online space is essential and we need strong regulation to kill the network effects that keep Twitter and reddit afloat.

    A platform should not be able to unilaterally censor anyone.

  • jibbist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The data is public, the feed just only prints out publicly available flight data - if Elon wants privacy, he should just charter a private jet used by other billionare dickheads, it’s not exactly a hardship now is it

  • bighi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For platforms with an amount of users in many millions, we need regulations on who can be banned, and for what reasons you can’t.

  • AquilaChill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a difference between keeping tabs on someone & stalking/harassment.
    I don’t like the Elon jet tracker stuff, I’m more a fan of privacy.

    • vind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not stalking though, if he wanted privacy he could fly on a normal commercial plane like everyone else.

    • Tosti@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The account only republishes publicly available data. The worlds flight data is publicly available (Google search: flight tracker).

      So there has never been, is or will be an expectation of privacy.

      Elon making a case to the contrary is just wrong. But he has the loudest bullhorn so he gets support from people on his asinine stance.

      If he wanted privacy, he should not have aimed to become one of the most public influencers in order to cash in on his fame.

    • starlinguk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can track most flights on flightradar24. It’s public information. When I see an interesting plane fly past I look it up on Flight Radar. It’s usually on there unless it’s a small crop dusting plane.