Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

  • I shouldn’t have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.

  • We shouldn’t have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that’s blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.worldEnglish
    01·
    1 year ago

    Students and LLM do the same with data, simply in a different way. LLM can learn more data, student can understand more concepts, logic and context.

    And students study to make money.

    Both LLMs and students map the data in some internal representation, that is however pretty different, because a biological mind is different from an AI.

    Regarding your last paragraph, this is exactly the point. What shall openai and Microsoft pay, as they are making a lot of money out of other people work? Currently it is unclear as openai hasn’t released what data they used, and because copyright laws do not cover generative AI. We need to wait for interpretation of existing laws and for new ones. But it will change soon in the future for sure