• grte@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sixty million a year could build multiple public housing projects, every year. And on the other side of the balance scale is Charles.

        • Splitdipless@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In fact, if Canada goes with a “President,” it would cost more. Just on the election alone, but then they will also need an enlarged staff for their political works. Also, electing a President has really been working out well elsewhere, like the USA, hasn’t it?

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We could have a President that is ceremonial like the Governor General now. Which means this hole thing would be pointless just to change the name of some position.

      • oʍʇǝuoǝnu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s maybe enough for one 100 unit building a year, depending on where it’s built, which is something but so far from anything substantial.

        Building is fucking expensive right now even if the province uses paramountcy to bypass municipal zoning. Plus, the province sucks ass at building compared to private because its gov’t. That’s not too say I don’t support massive amounts of public housing being built because I do 100%, but gov’t is gov’t.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How is it costing us 60 million a year? Majority is Governor General. Well we still need that position it well just be named President of something. So don’t see how it well save any money.