Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Edit: just wanted to clarify that Steve from GN didn’t precisely say they’re starting to test soon, he said they will start WHEN the steam OS releases and is adopted. Sorry about that.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The only bastion left is anticheat. Everything else are just (bad) old habits fueled by marketing.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’ve been saying for years: we need a dedicated gaming operating system.

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I jumped into Linux, via Mint, about a year ago when I refreshed my hardware. The transition was pretty easy, and I haven’t looked back. Steam runs fine and I haven’t had a modern game that didn’t work under default proton settings except for things I’ve run outside Steam and mods. Most of my personal PC’s workload is gaming and handful of web-based apps that are effectively OS-agnostic; Everything else has an easy equivalent in the apt repos.

    I would say that my decision to embrace Linux as my OS was primarily influenced by my Steam Deck. Gaming on it has been simple and the desktop UI was easy to adapt to. I replaced my laptop with the Steam Deck, bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and a USB-C dock with HDMI out (all things I already had for the laptop). I now just hook into whatever TV is handy as a monitor when I need a computer on the go.

    I was a tech enthusiast when I was younger, and am thus familiar with fucking around on the command line, but now I’m an old man who just wants his stuff to work and it just has… The barrier of entry for the Linux Desktop is effectively gone. We just need PR now.

    Also, I think I’d replace Mint on my primary PC with SteamOS, given a simple way to do so. About a year ago, the desktop/beta SteamOS was not fully baked.

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You should give Bazzite a go on your desktop, it’s very similar to SteamOS and the desktop experience has been great for me. I didn’t have a Steam Deck and transitioned to it, and the smoothness convinced me to get a Lenovo Legion Go and install Bazzite straight OOTB.

  • Noved@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    New to the Linux community here; why is a valve owned Linux OS better than any other massive company OS. Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

    At the end of the day, we don’t want our OS’s big company owned right?

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      SteamOS is better than, for example, macOS and Windows because of licenses.

      Since you’re new (welcome!), I should let you in on a little secret: pretty much the entire free software movement is built around licensing. I know, it’s boring and seems insignificant. But the outcomes are profound.

      Because SteamOS is built to function within the free software ecosystem, it means users are never beholden to the decisions of one centralized entity (usually the company that owns the software patents.)

      If Valve ever decides to, say, include candy crush ads in SteamOS’ start menu (they’d have to make their own start menu, since right now SteamOS uses one that’s already made by the free software community), then users can choose to remove that part of the menu or replace the menu altogether without having to start from scratch.

      For wealthy people who can always pay the “proprietary tax,” this might seem like a non-issue. Practically speaking, these people only want their software to work without hassle. They don’t care about the true cost of that software, such as only one entity being able to modify/distribute the software. It’s not until, say, photoshop starts charging a subscription (which they can always increase the price of) that people start to see the value in free software and the importance of licensing.

    • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Microsoft is deeply entrenched and has undergone decades of enshittification. SteamOS is at only the beginning of this cycle. And since SteamOS is linux-based, it’s likely to have ramifications for the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem. Furthermore, if there are two vastly different OSes that developers and graphics card manufacturers need to seriously target, they’re more likely to write more platform-agnostic software that everyone can benefit from.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Because valve is a private company. They don’t have to answer to shareholders. That means, they don’t go through enshitifaction, they care about their product and their customers. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, are they good? Better than every single company out there that tries to be like them. Period.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I’m glad people bring this up.

        Private companies are not intrinsically better than public ones, but at least they have the capacity to be.

        Valve is one of the very few examples of a company that sees the value in working with customers, not against them. This would be impossible if Valve were publicly-traded.

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Exactly. They’re (as far I know) the only company that emailed me to tell me that I can take to court directly without an arbitration. Not that I’ll ever be able to afford it, but seeing how confident and pro-consumer (I fucking hate the word consumer lol) they are is amazing.

          • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            To be fair, that was in their own financial best interest. Since arbitrations are charged a fee per customer someone figured out that you can do an effective “class action” against valve by having many people submit the same arbitration claim against valve and costing them so much through the arbitration fees that it it was almost impossible for them to cone out on top regardless of the outcome of the arbitration (iirc).

            They changed to allowing lawsuits because they can request those to be merged, and therefore its cost-effective for them to fight them.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Valve dosnt really “own” SteamOS. They maintain and update SteamOS, but SteamOS is free and open source

      Plus just about everbody who knows anything about steam would tell you they are probably the most consumer friendly billion dollar company ever, and have been for decades. So yes even if they owned it like microsoft owns windows it would still be better

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

      It’s worth noting that steamOS, like any Linux distro has its issues and a bit of a learning curve. Especially if you want to go off the beaten track, it’s pretty much just using a stock arch distro.

      As for if MS switched to Linux, no it wouldn’t be good because the issues with Win11 overwhelmingly aren’t a matter of incompetence or anything inherent to the code, but of conscious anti-consumer business decisions. There’s nothing about Linux that would actively stop MS from cramming telemetry, bloat, etc. In their distro.

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The source is always free so you could fork it if you disagree with them. Also it means broader support for Linux gaming

    • beaiouns@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If it’s like the steam deck version, it’ll be based on Arch with a bunch of steam-specific patches/configs to make games run more easily (with the added bonus of making non-steam games run pretty well too). Steam exists to sell games, and if they want to make it easier for me to play games, that’s fine by me.

      Not sure what a Microsoft distro would look like, but if they make a distro that’ll run Xbox games with gamepass, I’d give it a shot.

      Another nice bonus for either/both of those situations is that it wouldn’t be too hard to incorporate those changes into other distros. That way people who want more of an “install and go” experience would have their official distros, people who like to tinker could work on importing the official code into their unofficial setup, and people who use arch btw can install it from the AUR.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is so great to see, and the timing is perfect.

    My son already calls the PC Steam, as in “we played game A on Xbox and game B on Steam,” so maybe by the time he has a PC in his room Steam really will run the whole platform.

  • gramgan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I thought this had already happened?

    I remember seeing ads on Steam for SteamOS years ago—wasn’t there a point at which you could download and run it on your own computer? What happened?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      From what I recall, it wasn’t something you could easily use like a normal distro, and that version was based on Debian (so stable but outdated software). It only worked on some hardware, and you had to do a full system wipe.

      More likely, this is them officially partnering with handheld or gaming laptop makers, using their latest Arch-based distro and allowing them to use Valve/Steam branding as a selling point.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If I recall correctly, this has never happened the way it’s happening now. It was a matter of “hey, you can fork it on GitHub and make your own iso thing”, hence why there was a “holoiso” or something like that that (I keep forgetting the name) where people used if they wanted to install steamOS on a device. This one is straight supported by valve. Like “hey, here is our official steam OS that we use on our steam deck. Use it and we will support you”.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My understanding is the big change here is that they’re specifically making it available to other handheld manufacturers, which is huge, because windows handhelds have not been great because of how much the bloat of Windows steals performance and battery life. They’re making steps to make SteamOS (I.e. Linux in general) the default OS for handhelds and non-console dedicated gaming machines in general.

        If it works, it will put tremendous pressure on publishers to support linux, which is great.

      • bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Iirc the original steamOS was Debian based and you really had to be an experienced Linux user to use and enjoy it.

        With the new steamOS (arch based?) it’s a much more streamlined experience and opens up the user base because of it

    • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think modern steamos is based on a different distro then it was then. Also proton is good enough now to justify switching for a lot of people

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah, choosing Arch as the base of something that’s supposed to be newbie-friendly and stable is wild, but it seems to have been working so far.

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Old steam os was an Ubuntu derived OS. Ubuntu has issues relating to the organization that runs it. New steam os is basically a coat of paint on top of Arch which is community based. The old os is deprecated.

      The version on steam deck is fantastic, but they have been polishing it for desktop use for a while now. I can’t wait to have it available.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To anyone reading this thinking “once SteamOS comes out, I’ll switch”, you should know:

    Gaming on Linux is already here. Pick a distro and game. You can take advantage of Proton right now. You don’t need to wait for one specific distro.

    I’ve personally been gaming on Linux exclusively for about 3 years. Windows games, not Linux games.

    Edit: based on other commenters’ suggestions, I’ll give you some.

    I have gamed for those three years on PopOS. It is a distro based on Debian, ultimately, which means it’s also related to Ubuntu and Mint. Realistically, you can pick any of those 4 and you should have a nice experience.

    Arch is popular with the übergeeks, and I do use it on my laptop, BTW, but you shouldn’t use it as a first distro.

    The concept of “distro” doesn’t really exist for Windows, because you pretty much get one monolithic product. But basically, it is a specific mix of software that works together and relies on the Linux kernel. Imagine it as a “version” of Windows with specific goals, some of which are overlapping (e.g. Mint and Ubuntu tend to cater to the same audience).

    If you get far enough into it, the freedom that Linux allows means that you can turn any distro into any other distro.

      • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think that is perfectly valid and I’ll happily recommend steamos to newcomers. I’m only a little worried about it being locked to flatpaks by default though. Hopefully that will change, but for most users it will be a good start.

          • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            One flatpak uses a lot of extra disk space, but for each additional flatpak you add to a system the disk space difference is much smaller because they share dependencies. When it’s system-wide for all user-installed packages, the difference is quite small.

              • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                They don’t share dependencies with the base system, but they do share dependencies with each other, so long as those dependencies are at the same version, which most of them are because flatpaks generally stay quite up to date.

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            The marginal extra disk spaces used by flatpak really isn’t a concern for most users, much less valve. If you do everything in flatpak and your apps only use current runtime versions, the additional space used by flatpak is in the megabytes, since libraries like libc are going to be on your host no matter what.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            The typical linux flow is not important to learn for most and flatpak is easier for the vast majority of people to understand and deal with

            furthermore flatpak is rapidly becoming the typical linux flow

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This is fair. I should have given my own suggestions.

        Mint is probably the choice at the moment for new folks. Also, this will be controversial, but feel free with Ubuntu. It will get you started, and that’s great.

        Edit: I added some (open-ended) suggestions to my original comment.

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I actually think mint is a terrible choice for beginners because it’s not kde, which is by far the best for windows people, and it isn’t immutable, which is a gamechanger for not having to maintain your system

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I see the point about KDE, though I don’t think the learning curve on Cinnamon is hefty. I also think that KDE being so configurable can seem overwhelming to new folks.

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              As someone who gives kde to new folks all the time, most of them never configure anything and this isn’t a real problem any of them face. I mostly give this to the elderly and tech illiterate.

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s actually surprising how easy it is to use.

      My wife was playing Baldur’s Gate 3 on her windows laptop (GOG version, DRM free) and I just wanted to see if I can run it on my Linux laptop.

      Just copied the game folder from her laptop to my external SSD, plugged it into my laptop, ran through proton. Everything works without any issues. Simple as that.

      I was pleasantly surprised. We could even join via LAN and had some co-op fun. After trying it out I think I’m buying the game.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        ran through proton

        See, this is after where most gaming folks hop off.

        In all fairness, if you just run Lutris (pre-installed on Bazzite), log into GOG from there and install and run the game through their wizard, it also “just works”.
        That might be easier for most.

        • vort3@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Probably true, it depends. There are Steam folks and then there are GOG folks.

          I prefer GOG tbh because it’s DRM free, but for some games I still need Steam, unfortunately.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tbh the vast majority of people who say “ill switch to (insert Linux distro here) when (insert accomplishment here)” will most likley never switch

    • megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      For all the not super technically inclined people out there, I would recommend Linux mint with cinnamon, you’ll feel right at home and won’t face any real issues so long as you don’t want to play LoL, a few other big multiplayer games have anti cheat systems that don’t like Linux.

    • DuckBilledMongoose@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m hoping that steamos will make Linux much more popular so that devs take notice. Whilst wine/proton are amazing anticheat still exists. If enough people move to steamos they will have to make sure they’re not excluded

  • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I saw a post on bluesky saying Steamdeck can’t be widely adopted because of linux. I asked why is that the case? He says "Linux doesn’t run as many games as windows ". I said “only a few and the anti cheat ones”. He kept arguing. I asked him about nintendo and he goes “It has the games to back it up” and I blocked him lol.

    Millions of games are not enough because its FOMO.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Linux doesn’t run as many games as Windows

      I’d argue it runs more due to compatibility breaks. Wine just-werks with a lot of old installers.

      • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Hit or miss sadly, but still damn close to magic. I can play skyrim and it runs… As expected, but can’t install dark souls rn.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          I’ve got Dark Souls: Prepare to Die Edition (with DSFix) working just fine.

          I don’t remember having to do anything weird… Have you tried ProtonGE? Maybe it was DSFix that makes it work? I don’t remember if I tried playing without DSFix first.

          • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            My copy’s pirated thats prolly Why u don’t have issues, I’m launching the installer wine installer.exe

              • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Rip. At least my gta5 dodi repack plays… OK. Either play a pirated copy of gta5 or simply don’t play it at all cus my legitimate copy can’t play cus its epic games and the cockstar launcher won’t connect to the internet thus locking me out of the game, even offline🤡. It has issues with light, when it hits at certain angles the whole map becomes white AF and things from a distant draw poorly, like mountains and such. Other than that thank god triple a games are at least playable on gnux. Ty crackers and ty wine+proton :3

                • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  It has issues with light, when it hits at certain angles the whole map becomes white AF and things from a distant draw poorly, like mountains and such

                  WTF

      • thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Indeed. I couldn’t get a couple of old 3DO games working on windows 10/11 even though I bought them on Steam.

        Work great on Linux w/ Photon (aka wine).

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have both. As a pure console I still prefer the Switch, and there is a huge overlap in the games. But the Deck is much more than just a gaming handheld, it is now my only PC as well.

      • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I understand why there are so many Nintendo gamers. I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy of people. Whenever it comes to linux, they demand everything be perfect. They never show the same attitude towards others. Captialism shills.

        • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Nintendo has fans and is an established brand. But I think what most people dislike is the uncertainty. With the Switch you can know for certain all games you buy will work, but with the Steam Deck it’s not guaranteed though it will scan your library and give you a rating. Though in my case I had many “unsupported” games actually work flawlessly.

          • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I think is more of like the fear of the unknown than the uncertainty, for example is uncertain if a new switch game will run well(looking at you pokémon)

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Every game I bought on Steam under Windows runs great on Steam in Linux Mint. The few games I didn’t buy on Steam (Deus Ex, Giants: Citizen Kabuto) run great on Wine, using the default settings.

    Adopting Proton was the smartest thing Valve ever did. They’re going to get about 90% of gamers migrating from Windows to Linux, who don’t want to fiddle with configuration settings.

  • somenonewho@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been using Linux exclusively for ~14 years now. Heavily gaming on Linux only for the last ~8 years.

    It was possible (though sometimes headache inducing) to play most games back then (Wine and soon Proton to thank) the biggest change IMHO came with SteamPlay since it turned the headache into one click on most games (thanks to the amazing work of wine/proton developers and the tinkering of the community).

    When the SteamDeck released people seemed surprised at the breadth of games that were running on day one. To me it was not really a surprise since I had been Linux gaming with SteamPlay all the time and was almost expecting games to “just work” (though I still would and still am checking ProtonDB before purchase).

    What the SteamDeck changed in my view was

    1. Showing “everyone” that Linux Gaming is a thing that’s happening and been happening for a while. So maybe check it out?
    2. That a Handheld that doesn’t have to work around Windows but uses a purpose built OS just makes a lot more sense

    I feel that the SteamDeck with SteamOS has really put Linux, especially Linux gaming on the map. Even though I want to be like “Linux Gaming has been a thing forever, I was doing it before it was cool” ;) I have to recognize that fact. In the past years I’ve seen so many people setting up Linux especially by the way of SteamOS (using HoloISO, Chimera …) just to play/mess with it which is also why I think an Official SteamOS release will make a huge difference.

    Tl;dr: Gaming on Linux was a thing before. But the SteamDeck/SteamOS 3 made a huge impact nonetheless.

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I haven’t run across a game that hasn’t run on The Deck yet. I know it’s capable of running quite a lot, but I got it to play indie games. It’s been great and does what I want it to do phenomenally. Additionallh if I ever wanted to do something more demanding on it, I could.

  • Patariki@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I just build a new gaming/creative pc, decided to make the jump to linux mint while i was setting up something new. And I honestly expected more hickups than i got, nothing which a quick search didn’t fix except for one. My xbox controller won’t connect over Bluetooth, it works when connected through a cable though. But I also noticed some stick drift, so I’m tossing it and order an 8bitdo which has those magentic sticks (forgot the name) and linux compatibility.